# RETRACTION: Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Between Intravascular Ultrasound‐Guided and Angiography‐Guided Drug‐Eluting Stent Implantation: A Meta‐Analysis of Randomised Control Trials and Systematic Review

## TL;DR

This paper was retracted because it was accepted due to a compromised peer review process and does not present valid research findings.

## Contribution

The paper does not contribute new findings as it has been retracted due to ethical issues in the peer review process.

## Key findings

- The article was retracted due to a compromised peer review process.
- The authors did not respond to the retraction notice.
- The retraction was agreed upon by the journal's Editor in Chief and publisher.

## Abstract

RETRACTION:

TanY.Y.
,
ManX.X.
,
LiuL.Y.
, and
XuH.
, “Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Between Intravascular Ultrasound‐Guided and Angiography‐Guided Drug‐Eluting Stent Implantation: A Meta‐Analysis of Randomised Control Trials and Systematic Review,” International Wound Journal
16, no. 3 (2019): 649–658, 10.1111/iwj.13073.30697972
PMC7949287

The above article, published online on 30 January 2019, in Wiley Online Library (http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/), has been retracted by agreement between the journal Editor in Chief, Professor Keith Harding; and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Following an investigation by the publisher, all parties have concluded that this article was accepted solely on the basis of a compromised peer review process. The editors have therefore decided to retract the article. The authors did not respond to our notice regarding the retraction.

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12015187