Feed efficiency and fecal microbiome of nursery pigs from parents with divergent breeding value for feed conversion ratio
Yujia Wu, Paula Azevedo, Shunshun Jin, Haoxiang Xu, Huaigang Lei, Lisanne Verschuren, Argenis Rodas-Gonzalez, Martin Nyachoti, Chengbo Yang

TL;DR
This study found that genetic selection for feed efficiency in pigs does not affect early growth or gut microbiome traits in nursery pigs.
Contribution
The study provides new insights into the lack of early-life microbiome and performance differences in pigs selected for feed efficiency.
Findings
No significant differences in feed intake, weight gain, or feed efficiency were observed between pigs from different EBV_FCR lines.
Fecal microbiota composition and functionality were similar across groups, with only a trend toward higher beta diversity in high-efficiency pigs.
Genetic selection for feed efficiency did not influence nursery-stage growth or microbiome traits.
Abstract
Improving feed efficiency (FE) is essential for the swine industry’s economic and environmental sustainability. Genetic selection, particularly through estimating breeding values for feed conversion ratio (EBV_FCR), is a common strategy to enhance FE. However, the biological mechanisms underlying phenotypic variations in FE between pigs with different EBV_FCR values are not fully understood. This study investigates these mechanisms by examining growth performance, nutrient and energy digestibility, and fecal microbiota composition and functionality of pigs at the nursery stage. The study involved 128 pigs, weaned at 21 d (±2 d) and with an initial body weight of 6.87 kg (±0.34 kg). These pigs, selected from dam and sire lines with divergent EBV_FCR values, were randomly assigned to 32 pens with four pigs each. Pigs were fed a corn and soybean meal-based diet, divided into two feeding…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAnimal Nutrition and Physiology · Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies · Agriculture, Soil, Plant Science
