# Understanding implementation, adoption, and acceptability of the WHO package of essential noncommunicable (PEN) disease interventions in FIJI: Evidence for scale-up

**Authors:** Bindu Patel, Devina Nand, Mohammed Alvis Zibran, Gade Waqa, Donald Wilson, Unise Vakaloloma, Rohina Joshi, Azeb Gebresilassie Tesema, Colleen Wilson, Stephen Jan, Man Thi Hue Vo

PMC · DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0004344 · PLOS Global Public Health · 2025-04-21

## TL;DR

This study examines how a noncommunicable disease intervention program was implemented in Fiji, highlighting successes and challenges in healthcare delivery.

## Contribution

The study provides insights into the implementation and acceptability of the WHO PEN program in Fiji, identifying factors influencing its adoption.

## Key findings

- The PEN program was well received by formally trained health workers.
- Key challenges included lack of medicines, equipment, and workforce shortages.
- Improving the program requires strengthening health system components like supply chains and workforce retention.

## Abstract

The Package of Essential Noncommunicable (PEN) disease interventions in response to the high prevalence of cardiovascular diseases and diabetes was implemented in Fiji commencing in 2012. This study aimed to understand implementation outcomes, and its contextual influences. Semi-structured interviews with health workers and patients across Fiji was conducted. Thematic analysis was mapped to the health system building blocks to understand PEN service delivery. The PEN program was well received by health workers formally trained. The frequency of use of PEN guidelines was influenced at the individual level by motivation, capability and capacity as well as external factors outside of the health workers’ control. The key challenges to routine use were lack of essential medicines and equipment for CVD risk screening and management, shortage of health workers, high turnover of staff, limited formal training, and no designated focal person. However, at the country level, the PEN program improved the quality of care by providing patients with regular follow-up visits depending on their CVD risk levels. The patients found care to be comprehensive when they were also seen by dieticians and physiotherapists. In most instances, the barrier to access to care were cost and distance of travel and non-availability of essential medicines. To improve use of PEN program requires strengthening health system components: 1) need for efficient supply chain system for medicines and equipment, 2) improving healthcare workforce retention, 3) establishing accountability mechanisms embedded within the health centres, 4) health information system to track patient level data and 5) multi-level governance structures across the health system.

## Linked entities

- **Diseases:** diabetes (MONDO:0005015)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** (PEN) disease (MESH:D000073296), cardiovascular diseases (MESH:D002318), diabetes (MESH:D003920)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12011304/full.md

## Figures

3 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12011304/full.md

## References

22 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12011304/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12011304