# Influence of Reproductive Status on Occupancy of Salvage‐Logged Boreal Forest by Moose ( Alces americanus )

**Authors:** Julie P. Thomas, Mary L. Reid, Robert M. R. Barclay, Thomas S. Jung

PMC · DOI: 10.1002/ece3.71302 · Ecology and Evolution · 2025-04-18

## TL;DR

The study shows that female moose with calves avoid recently logged areas for safety, while solitary moose use these areas for food, highlighting the need for mixed-age forests to support different moose groups.

## Contribution

The study introduces multistate occupancy models to reveal how reproductive status influences moose habitat use after salvage logging.

## Key findings

- Female moose with calves prefer regenerating and unsalvaged forests with hiding cover.
- Solitary moose use recently logged areas with shrubby forage despite low canopy cover.
- Forest age is a key factor in habitat selection for reproductive moose.

## Abstract

Wildlife‐habitat relationships reflect the behavioral choices made by species in response to perceived risks and rewards. Ungulates must often choose between habitats that provide forage and those offering concealment from predators, yet natural and anthropogenic disturbances create risky landscapes where tradeoffs may be difficult to navigate. Ungulate responses to forest disturbance may vary by sex and reproductive state, given that reproductive females with calves often prioritize predator avoidance. We investigated state‐dependent habitat use by reproductive and solitary moose (
Alces americanus
) in response to salvage logging after a widespread infestation by spruce beetle (
Dendroctonus rufipennis
) in the boreal forest of Yukon, Canada. We used camera traps and multistate occupancy models to examine moose occurrence in unsalvaged and salvage‐logged forests at different regenerative stages (0–10 years and 11–25 years postlogging) and levels of tree retention after logging. We compared results to single‐state occupancy models that did not account for reproductive status. As predicted, single‐state models showed high use of stands with low canopy cover and maximum tree removal (i.e., clear‐cuts). This suggested that moose capitalized on shrubby forage available in logged stands, regardless of regenerative stage. However, this result was overly simplistic. Multistate occupancy models revealed that forest age was the most important factor for female moose with calves, in contrast to solitary moose. Females with calves tended to avoid newly logged areas and preferred regenerating and unsalvaged forests with hiding cover, although estimates of effect size had low precision. Climate change is contributing to the rising frequency and severity of bark beetle outbreaks, and post‐infestation salvage logging has been implicated in the decline of moose populations in western Canada. Our results support the need to maintain diverse, mixed‐age forest landscapes to meet the food and cover requirements of moose in different demographic classes.

We investigated state‐dependent habitat use by reproductive and solitary moose in response to salvage logging after a widespread spruce bark beetle infestation in Yukon, Canada. We used camera traps and multistate occupancy models to examine moose occurrence in unsalvaged and salvage‐logged forest stands at different regenerative stages (0–10 years and 11–25 years postlogging) and levels of tree retention. Female moose with calves tended to minimize predation risk by using protective forest cover and avoiding recently logged stands, in contrast to the preferences of nonreproductive moose.

## Linked entities

- **Species:** Alces americanus (taxon 999462), Dendroctonus rufipennis (taxon 77170)

## Full-text entities

- **Species:** Dendroctonus rufipennis (spruce beetle, species) [taxon 77170], Bos taurus (bovine, species) [taxon 9913], Alces americanus (American moose, species) [taxon 999462]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12008008/full.md

## Figures

4 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12008008/full.md

## References

97 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12008008/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12008008