# Trunk kinematics and motor unit behavior during different loads and speeds in individuals with and without aberrant movement patterns during active forward bending: A cross-sectional study

## TL;DR

This study compares trunk movement and muscle activity in people with and without abnormal movement patterns during forward bending under different loads and speeds.

## Contribution

The study reveals distinct kinematic and motor unit behavior differences between individuals with and without instability catch during forward bending.

## Key findings

- Significant between-group differences were found in kinematic parameters between individuals with and without IC.
- Individuals with IC showed significant within-group changes in kinematic parameters under different load conditions.
- Motor unit behavior differences suggest distinct neuromuscular strategies in individuals with and without IC.

## Abstract

Instability catch (IC) during active forward bending is an aberrant movement pattern observed in patients with low back pain. Increasing load and speed may show different responses in kinematics and motor unit behavior including peak amplitudes (pAMP) and mean firing rates (mFR).

This study aimed to compare kinematic patterns under different loads and speeds and explored the motor unit behavior in individuals with and without IC.

17 participants were classified as having IC and 10 participants were classified as having no IC from clinical observations. Inertial measurement units were used to quantify kinematic parameters, and decomposition electromyography (dEMG) was used to investigate motor unit behavior. Participants performed 2 sets of 1-minute forward bending under low load and low speed (LL), high load and low speed (HL), and low load and high speed (LH) conditions.

Significant between-group differences (P < 0.05) were found in kinematic parameters. Significant within-group changes (P < 0.05) were found between the LL and HL conditions for all kinematic parameters in individuals with IC. Individuals without IC demonstrated significant within-group changes (P < 0.05) between LL and LH in mFR, while individuals without IC showed changes in both pAMP and mFR.

These kinematic parameters may represent IC. Changes in motor unit behavior suggest that individuals with and without IC used different strategies to perform this task. Clinicians may consider varying the speed of movement to challenge the trunk neuromuscular control system and design interventions to address motor unit firing rate.