# Relationship between experiencing a challenge or delay accessing contraception and contraceptive self-efficacy: Data from a 2022 nationally representative online survey

**Authors:** Alex Schulte, Ariana H. Bennett, Jennet Arcara, Jamie Bardwell, Aisha Chaudhri, Laura Davis, Brittni Frederiksen, Elizabeth Jones, Catherine Labiran, Raegan McDonald-Mosley, Whitney Rice, Tara Stein, Ena Suseth Valladares, Kari White, Cassondra Marshall, Anu Manchikanti Gomez

PMC · DOI: 10.1186/s12978-025-02003-3 · Reproductive Health · 2025-04-15

## TL;DR

This study finds that experiencing challenges or delays in accessing contraception is linked to lower confidence in obtaining or switching contraceptive methods.

## Contribution

The study introduces person-centered metrics to examine how access barriers affect contraceptive self-efficacy.

## Key findings

- About 14% of respondents experienced a challenge or delay in accessing contraception in the past year.
- Experiencing a challenge/delay was associated with decreased odds of feeling confident in obtaining or switching contraceptive methods.

## Abstract

Previous research has found self-efficacy is associated with reproductive health behaviors and outcomes. However, few studies have quantitatively examined the relationship between barriers accessing contraception and self-efficacy. In addition, existing population-level metrics of contraceptive access tend to focus on method availability, uptake, and use, rather than people’s self-defined needs and preferences. This study uses person-centered metrics to assess the relationship between experiencing a recent challenge or delay obtaining desired contraception and two measures of contraceptive self-efficacy.

In 2022, we fielded a nationally representative survey in English and Spanish using NORC’s AmeriSpeak panel, surveying non-sterile 15- to 44-year-olds assigned female sex at birth in the U.S. We describe common challenges and delays obtaining contraception and present the distribution of experiencing a challenge or delay obtaining contraception by key sociodemographic and reproductive health characteristics. We also conduct logistic regression analyses to investigate associations between experiencing a challenge/delay and two measures of contraceptive self-efficacy: confidence in obtaining a desired method when wanted and perceived ease of switching methods when wanted.

Among the analytic sample of respondents who had ever used or tried to obtain a contraceptive product, device, or procedure (unweighted n = 2,771), about 14% experienced a challenge/delay obtaining desired contraception in the past year. The most common reasons for challenges or delays were related to logistics (transportation, childcare, scheduling; 38.2%) and cost/insurance coverage (35.8%). Among those who experienced a challenge/delay obtaining desired contraception (unweighted n = 301), higher proportions were younger, identified as non-heterosexual, had lower educational attainment, and could afford smaller emergency expenses compared to the subgroup that did not experience a challenge/delay. Experiencing a challenge/delay was associated with decreased odds of feeling very or somewhat confident in obtaining a desired method (aOR 0.14; 95% CI 0.07, 0.25) and decreased odds of feeling it would be very or somewhat easy to switch contraceptive methods (aOR 0.48; 95% CI 0.33, 0.71).

Eliminating barriers to contraceptive care is crucial to achieving person-centered access. Our research suggests that experiencing a challenge/delay has implications not only for recent contraceptive access but also influences self-efficacy, potentially inhibiting future ability to obtain and use desired contraception.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** FABM (MESH:D058926), BIPOC (MESH:C000719196), SARC (MESH:D052496), discrimination (MESH:D010468), IUD (MESH:D058736), PCCC (MESH:D010554), LARC (MESH:D000094024)
- **Chemicals:** ASAP (MESH:C070385), -acting reversible contraception (-), copper (MESH:D003300)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12001391/full.md

## References

16 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12001391/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12001391