# Experience of linking to the NHS diabetic eye screening programme records in the ASCEND-eye randomized trial and recommendations for improvement

**Authors:** Emily Sammons, Louise Bowman, Marion Mafham, Jane Armitage

PMC · DOI: 10.1016/j.conctc.2025.101474 · Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications · 2025-03-28

## TL;DR

This paper describes the challenges faced when linking diabetic eye screening records to a clinical trial and offers recommendations for future research.

## Contribution

The paper provides a detailed account and recommendations for accessing NHS DESP data for research purposes.

## Key findings

- The process of gaining approval and acquiring DESP data took four years and faced multiple challenges.
- Barriers include lack of documentation, no central data repository, and limited collaboration from DESPs.
- Researchers need clearer guidance and better support to access routinely collected healthcare data.

## Abstract

The ASCEND-Eye sub-study of the large, double-blind, 2x2 factorial design, placebo-controlled ASCEND trial compared the effects of aspirin and, separately, omega-3 fatty acids on diabetic retinopathy outcomes derived from NHS Diabetic Eye Screening Programmes (DESP) in England and Wales, in adults aged 40 years or older with diabetes and no pre-existing atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. ASCEND-Eye was unprecedented in what it set out to achieve; no previous studies had successfully obtained linked DESP data for research purposes on a national scale in England and Wales before.

To describe our experience of linking DESP records to help other researchers wishing to use them. We explain the application process, lead times and resources required, and how these data were governed.

The process of gaining regulatory and ethics committee approval for ASCEND-Eye through to data acquisition took four years. Several challenges were encountered, including a lack of documentation defining the governance of the NHS screening service, the absence of a single central data repository, the inherent complexity of liaising with multiple data controllers, and a lack of responsiveness to invitations to collaborate by nearly half of the DESPs in England.

Routinely collected healthcare data is a valuable source of outcome measure information in clinical trials. However, researchers frequently face barriers to accessing these datasets despite having written informed consent from trial participants to do so. We hope to encourage more NHS DESPs to take part in research.

## Linked entities

- **Diseases:** diabetic retinopathy (MONDO:0005266), diabetes (MONDO:0005015), atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (MONDO:1060134)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (MESH:D050197), diabetic retinopathy (MESH:D003930), Diabetic (MESH:D003920)
- **Chemicals:** aspirin (MESH:D001241), omega-3 fatty acids (MESH:D015525)

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11999369/full.md

## Figures

2 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11999369/full.md

## References

17 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11999369/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11999369