# A screening question to assess risk of using antibiotics without a prescription: a diagnostic study

**Authors:** Ashley Collazo, Eva Amenta, Kiara Olmeda, Marissa Valentine-King, Lindsey Laytner, Azalia Mancera, Roger Zoorob, Michael K. Paasche-Orlow, Richard L. Street Jr, Barbara W. Trautner, Larissa Grigoryan

PMC · DOI: 10.1186/s12875-025-02811-3 · BMC Primary Care · 2025-04-15

## TL;DR

This study explores how prior non-prescription antibiotic use can predict future misuse, aiming to improve antimicrobial stewardship in healthcare.

## Contribution

The study introduces a screening method to identify individuals likely to misuse antibiotics in the future based on past behavior.

## Key findings

- Approximately 43.6% of respondents reported prior non-prescription antibiotic use.
- Screening for past 12-month non-prescription use showed high specificity and predictive value for future misuse.

## Abstract

Non-prescription antibiotic use (using antibiotics without medical advice) is potentially unsafe and promotes antimicrobial resistance. We studied predictors of prior non-prescription use and whether screening for prior non-prescription antibiotic use predicted intention of future non-prescription antibiotic use.

The survey was performed from January 2020 - June 2021 in six public primary care clinics and two private emergency departments. Prior non-prescription users were respondents who reported taking oral antibiotics for symptoms without contacting a clinician. Intended use was defined by answering yes to the question, “would you use antibiotics without contacting a doctor/nurse/dentist/clinic.” We examined predictors for prior non-prescription use. We also calculated the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value (PPV, NPV) of (a) any prior non-prescription antibiotic use and (b) prior use in the past 12 months - for future intended non-prescription use.

Of 564 survey respondents, 246 (43.6%) reported non-prescription use; 91 (37.0%) of these respondents, 16.1% overall, reported doing so in the past 12 months. Approximately 63% of non-prescription antibiotic use was in those with a previous prescription of the same antibiotic for similar symptoms/illnesses. The screening characteristics of non-prescription use in the past 12 months to identify intention to use of antibiotics without a prescription in the future were: sensitivity 75.9% (95% CI: 65.3–84.6), specificity 91.4% (95% CI: 87.8–94.2), Bayes’ PPV 74.5% (95% CI: 66.7–80.9), and Bayes’ NPV 93.7% (95% CI: 90.5–96.1).

This study proposed a method to screen for future use of non-prescription antibiotics, which may have implications on antimicrobial stewardship efforts in primary care settings.

## Full-text entities

- **Genes:** MPO (myeloperoxidase) [NCBI Gene 4353]
- **Diseases:** allergic (MESH:D004342), flu (MESH:D007251), sore throat (MESH:D010612), 2019 coronavirus (MESH:D000086382), URI (MESH:D012141), Clostridioides difficile infections (MESH:D003015), deaths (MESH:D003643), sinus infection (MESH:D012852), dental symptoms (MESH:D012816), lower (MESH:D017116), cold (MESH:D000067390), skin/wound infections (MESH:D014946), urinary tract infections (MESH:D014552)
- **Chemicals:** ciprofloxacin (MESH:D002939), tetracycline (MESH:D013752), amoxicillin (MESH:D000658), trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (MESH:D015662), sulfa (-), penicillin (MESH:D010406)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11998457/full.md

## Figures

1 figure with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11998457/full.md

## References

5 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11998457/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11998457