# Assessment of the feed additive consisting of a strain belonging to Eggerthellaceae family (DSM 11798) for pigs and all avian species (1m01) for the renewal of its authorisation (BIOMIN GmbH)

**Authors:** Roberto Edoardo Villa, Giovanna Azimonti, Eleftherios Bonos, Henrik Christensen, Mojca Durjava, Birgit Dusemund, Ronette Gehring, Boet Glandorf, Maryline Kouba, Marta López‐Alonso, Francesca Marcon, Carlo Nebbia, Alena Pechová, Miguel Prieto‐Maradona, Ilen Röhe, Katerina Theodoridou, Baltasar Mayo, Montserrat Anguita, Jaume Galobart, Jordi Ortuño, Fabiola Pizzo, Rosella Brozzi

PMC · DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9360 · EFSA Journal · 2025-04-15

## TL;DR

This paper assesses the safety of a feed additive containing a bacterium from the Eggerthellaceae family for use in pig and poultry feed.

## Contribution

The paper confirms the safety of the additive for animals and consumers, while identifying potential risks for users.

## Key findings

- The additive is safe for pigs, poultry, and consumers under approved conditions.
- The additive is not an irritant but may cause skin and respiratory sensitisation.
- Efficacy assessment was not required for the renewal of authorisation.

## Abstract

Following a request from the European Commission, EFSA was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the assessment of the application for renewal of the authorisation of the preparation containing viable cells of the bacterium DSM 11798 intended for use as a technological additive (functional group: substances for reduction of the contamination of feed by mycotoxins) in feed for pigs and all avian species. The applicant provided evidence that the additive currently on the market complies with the existing terms of the authorisation. The identification of the active agent has been changed and it belongs to the Eggerthellaceae family. The EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) concluded that the additive remains safe for piglets, pigs for fattening and all avian species, consumers and the environment under the approved terms of the authorisation. Regarding user safety, the additive is not a skin or eye irritant. However, it should be considered a skin and respiratory sensitiser, and any exposure through the skin and respiratory tract is a risk. This conclusion would apply, in principle, to any preparation containing the active agent. There is no need for assessing the efficacy of the additive in the context of the renewal of the authorisation.

## Full-text entities

- **Species:** Sus scrofa (pig, species) [taxon 9823]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11997708/full.md

## References

6 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11997708/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11997708