Corrigendum to Incoherence in the Brain Death Guideline Regarding Brain Blood Flow Testing: Lessons from the Much-Publicized Case of Zack Dunlap
Abstract
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsOrgan Donation and Transplantation · Epilepsy research and treatment · Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Nguyen, Doyen, and Christine M. Zaine. 2025. Incoherence in the brain death guideline regarding brain blood flow testing: Lessons from the much-publicized case of Zack Dunlap. The Linacre Quarterly. doi:10.1177/00243639251317690.
For the above-mentioned article, the acknowledgment section has been updated. The correct acknowledgment reads as follows: