FonoTCS: validation of a tool for assessing clinical reasoning in Speech-Language pathology
Ana Cristina Côrtes Gama, Roberto da Costa Quinino, Adriane Mesquita Medeiros, Patrícia Cotta Mancini, Aline Mansueto Mourão, Lara Gama Santos, Thais Helena Machado, Nayara Ribeiro Gomes, Ana Cristina Côrtes Gama, Roberto da Costa Quinino, Adriane Mesquita Medeiros

TL;DR
This study validates a new tool called FonoTCS to assess clinical reasoning in speech-language pathology students and professionals who speak Brazilian Portuguese.
Contribution
The paper introduces and validates FonoTCS, a virtual, open-access clinical reasoning assessment tool tailored for Brazilian Portuguese speakers in speech-language pathology.
Findings
FonoTCS achieved high internal consistency with a Cronbach's Alpha of 0.903.
The final version of FonoTCS includes 88 items across 28 clinical cases.
The tool is valid and reliable for assessing clinical reasoning in generalist speech-language pathology students and professionals.
Abstract
To validate the internal structure of the Speech-Language Pathology Script Concordance Test (FonoTCS), which will be developed in a virtual, open-access format, to be used in the assessment of clinical reasoning among young professionals and students of speech-language pathology with a generalist background, speakers of Brazilian Portuguese. This is a study to validate the internal structure of the instrument. Twenty-five specialist speech-language pathologists, with more than 10 years of generalist clinical experience, and 35 students summoned for Enade participated. Both groups evaluated the 30 clinical cases with 120 items from FonoTCS. For the final selection of specialists who made up the sample, judges whose evaluations showed Z2 results >2 and Z<-2 distant from the modal response were removed. For the selection of items present in the final format of the test, those that…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsClinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills · Innovations in Medical Education · Radiology practices and education
