# Assessing Effectiveness of Passive Exoskeletons and Tool Selection on Ergonomic Safety in Manhole Cover Removal

**Authors:** Xun Wang, Ali Golabchi, Maryam Shakourisalim, Karla Beltran Martinez, Zeinab Estaji, Sarah Krell, Mahdi Tavakoli, Hossein Rouhani

PMC · DOI: 10.3390/s25072027 · Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025-03-24

## TL;DR

This study examines how passive exoskeletons and different tools affect ergonomic safety during manhole cover removal, finding that a lever tool is safest and exoskeletons help with more strenuous tools.

## Contribution

The study introduces a field-based comparison of passive exoskeletons and tool selection for reducing ergonomic risks in heavy manual tasks.

## Key findings

- The in-house lever tool was the safest and most efficient method, showing lowest muscle activity and REBA scores.
- Using the Jake tool with an exoskeleton significantly reduced muscle strain compared to using it without.
- Exoskeletons provided ergonomic benefits when used with more physically demanding tools like the Jake.

## Abstract

Manual material handling, a common practice in various industries, often involves moving or lifting heavy objects, placing significant physical strain on workers, especially in the lower back. A prime example is manhole cover removal, which typically requires handling heavy weights, potentially leading to lower back muscle strain. This study investigates the effectiveness of a passive exoskeleton in reducing ergonomic risks during manhole cover removal. Twenty able-bodied workers participated, performing the task with and without extractor tools in the field. Techniques such as surface electromyography and inertial measurement units were employed to measure muscle activity and body posture using the Rapid Entire Body Assessment (REBA). This study compared muscle activities and REBA scores under different conditions: manually lifting covers, using an in-house lever tool, and using a sledgehammer and a pick bar tool named Jake, both with and without an exoskeleton. Results revealed that the in-house Lever tool was the safest and most efficient method, resulting in the lowest muscle activities and REBA scores, regardless of exoskeleton use. Interestingly, the exoskeleton significantly reduced muscle strain when using the Jake tool. These findings indicate that while the Lever tool is optimal for this task, passive exoskeletons can effectively lower ergonomic risks associated with more physically demanding tools.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** muscle (MESH:D019042)

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11991122/full.md

## Figures

1 figure with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11991122/full.md

## References

40 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11991122/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11991122