# Explaining mobilization for revolts by private interests and kinship relations. A response to the comment by Nieva

**Authors:** Niccolò Giorgio Armandola, Malte Doehne, Katja Rost

PMC · DOI: 10.1177/10434631251324075 · Rationality and Society · 2025-03-13

## TL;DR

The paper responds to a comment by Ricardo Nieva, discussing how private interests and kinship relations influence mobilization for revolts.

## Contribution

The paper clarifies conceptual distinctions and explores overlaps between different theoretical approaches to mobilization.

## Key findings

- The authors identify points of overlap between their accounts and Nieva's framework.
- They clarify key conceptual distinctions regarding mobilization dynamics.
- Implications of each approach for understanding mobilization are explored.

## Abstract

We appreciate Ricardo Nieva’s thoughtful engagement with our paper and his proposal to interpret our case study through the lens of his theoretical framework. Indeed, we noted the potential of such a connection in the original paper, and thank Professor Nieva for taking up our suggestion. This response aims to identify points of overlap between our accounts, clarify key conceptual distinctions, and explore the implications of each approach for understanding the dynamics of mobilization.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** ORCID iDs (MESH:C535742)

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11991050/full.md

## References

15 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11991050/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11991050