# ALVAC-prime and monomeric gp120 protein boost induces distinct HIV-1 specific humoral and cellular responses compared with adenovirus-prime and trimeric gp140 protein boost

**Authors:** Leigh H. Fisher, Erica Lazarus, Chenchen Yu, Zoe Moodie, Daniel J. Stieh, Nicole Yates, Lu Zhang, Sheetal Sawant, Stephen C. De Rosa, Kristen W. Cohen, Daryl Morris, Shannon Grant, April Randhawa, Maurine D. Miner, Jenny Hendriks, Frank Wegmann, Katherine M. Gill, Fatima Laher, Linda-Gail Bekker, Glenda E. Gray, Lawrence Corey, M. Juliana McElrath, Troy Martin, Peter B. Gilbert, Georgia Tomaras, Stephen R. Walsh, Lindsey R. Baden

PMC · DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0004250 · PLOS Global Public Health · 2025-04-11

## TL;DR

This study compares two HIV vaccine regimens and finds differences in immune responses, but neither was effective in preventing HIV.

## Contribution

The study reveals distinct humoral and cellular immune responses elicited by different HIV vaccine regimens and identifies potential correlates of risk.

## Key findings

- HVTN 117/HPX2004 showed more durable IgG V1V2 responses compared to HVTN 100.
- CD8+ T-cell responses were absent in HVTN 100 but present in HVTN 117/HPX2004.
- Higher IgG3 responses to consensus Env antigens were observed in HVTN 117/HPX2004.

## Abstract

Although clade-specific and cross-clade mosaic prime–boost HIV-1 vaccine regimens were advanced to the HVTN 702 and HVTN 705 efficacy trials, neither regimen prevented HIV acquisition. The respective Phase 1/2a studies, HVTN 100 (NCT02404311) and HVTN 117/HPX2004 (NCT02788045), provided rich immunological data, including previously identified correlates of risk, for comparing immune responses elicited by these vaccine regimens over time. We analyzed antibody responses measured by binding antibody multiplex assay, and CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell responses measured by intracellular cytokine staining in per-protocol vaccinees in HVTN 100 (n=186) vs. HVTN 117/HPX2004 (n=99) after the months 6 and 12 vaccinations (months 6.5/7 and 12.5/13), and 6 months after the last vaccination (month 18). At month 12.5/13, both regimens induced similarly high IgG breadth against gp120, gp140, and V1V2 antigens, and similar IgG responses to gp70-BCaseA V1V2. IgG V1V2 responses were more durable in HVTN 117/HPX2004, with the largest difference in the gp70-BCaseA V1V2 IgG response rate at month 18 (17.8% in HVTN 100 vs 61.9% in HVTN 117/HPX2004, p<0.001). IgG3 responses to consensus Env antigens were higher and more durable in HVTN117/HPX2004; for example, IgG3 response rate to the consensus gp140 antigen was 65.9% in HVTN 117/HPX2004 vs 6.3% in HVTN 100 at month 18 (TMLE p<0.0001). At month 18, both regimens induced similar IgG3 responses to gp70-BCaseA V1V2 (3.2% in HVTN 100 vs 1.1% in HVTN 117/HPX2004). Polyfunctional CD4+ Env was significantly higher in HVTN 100, and polyfunctional CD4+ Gag was higher in HVTN 117/HPX2004. CD8+ T-cell responses were not seen in HVTN 100, while CD8+ T-cell response rates in HVTN 117/HPX2004 reached up to 42%. Despite the distinct immune responses induced by the two HIV vaccine regimens, the lack of demonstrated efficacy suggests that broader, higher magnitude, and possibly qualitatively different immune responses are needed for protection against HIV acquisition.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02404311 and NCT02788045; South African National Clinical Trials Registry (DOH-27-0215-4796)

## Linked entities

- **Proteins:** ITIH4 (inter-alpha-trypsin inhibitor heavy chain 4), gp140 (gp140), ERVW-1 (endogenous retrovirus group W member 1, envelope), gag (Pr55(Gag))

## Full-text entities

- **Genes:** CD8A (CD8 subunit alpha) [NCBI Gene 925] {aka CD8, CD8alpha, IMD116, Leu2, p32}, gp120 [NCBI Gene 3700;155971], Env [NCBI Gene 155971], gag (Pr55(Gag)) [NCBI Gene 155030], EMB (embigin) [NCBI Gene 133418] {aka GP70}, CD4 (CD4 molecule) [NCBI Gene 920] {aka CD4mut, IMD79, Leu-3, OKT4D, T4}
- **Chemicals:** BCaseA (-)
- **Species:** Human immunodeficiency virus 1 (no rank) [taxon 11676]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11990749/full.md

## Figures

6 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11990749/full.md

## References

43 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11990749/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11990749