# Assessment of Quality in Antimicrobial Calcium Phosphate Research (AQUACAP): A Systematic Review

**Authors:** Robert Kamphof, Jacobus Arts, Giuseppe Cama, Rob Nelissen, Bart Pijls

PMC · DOI: 10.3390/ma18071543 · 2025-03-28

## TL;DR

This paper introduces a quality checklist to evaluate research on antimicrobial calcium phosphate materials, identifying key areas for improvement in study design and reporting.

## Contribution

The novel contribution is the creation and application of a quality checklist to assess and improve the reporting and methodological quality of antimicrobial calcium phosphate research.

## Key findings

- Reporting quality averaged 18/32, with key areas needing improvement in data variability, study design rationales, and clinical relevance.
- Methodological quality averaged 11/18, with suggestions to include positive controls, clinically relevant formulations, and toxicity tests.
- Higher methodological quality was associated with more citations, but no link was found between quality and publication year.

## Abstract

The effectiveness of antimicrobial ion-substituted calcium phosphate biomaterials has been investigated in numerous studies, but reporting guidelines and quality checklists are missing. A novel quality checklist was created for assessing reporting and methodological quality by experts of relevant disciplines. The checklist consisted of 20 items for reporting quality (maximum score 32) and 11 for methodological quality (maximum score 18). The checklist was subsequently implemented to assess the reporting and methodological quality of 58 studies in this field. Possible associations between study quality, year of publication and citations were investigated, and items for improvement were identified. Main items for improvement in reporting quality (average score 18/32) were reporting variability and statistics of data, reporting rationales for study design and the clinical relevance of the outcomes. Methodological quality (average score 11/18) could be improved by including positive control groups, using clinically relevant material formulations and including tests of the material toxicity. No association was found between study quality and year of publication. Methodological quality was associated with a higher number of annual citations. This study identifies key areas for improvement of reporting and methodological quality in the field of ion-substituted antimicrobial calcium phosphates. With these findings, the quality of future studies on antimicrobial CaP materials can be improved. The new quality checklist can also be used to improve study design for future research and enables better comparison between study outcomes.

## Linked entities

- **Chemicals:** calcium phosphate (PubChem CID 24456)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** toxicity (MESH:D064420)

## Figures

3 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11990066/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11990066