The Impact of Vascular Anatomic Variations in the Infra-Pyloric Area on the Surgical Outcomes of Laparoscopic Pylorus-Preserving Gastrectomy in Early Gastric Cancer: A Post Hoc Analysis of a Multicenter Prospective Trial (KLASS-04)

TL;DR

This study examines how variations in the infra-pyloric artery affect surgical outcomes in early gastric cancer patients undergoing a specific laparoscopic procedure.

Contribution

The study reveals new insights into the impact of infra-pyloric artery variations on surgical duration during pylorus-preserving gastrectomy.

Findings

The infra-pyloric artery types were more diverse than previously reported.

Surgical operating time varied significantly based on the type of infra-pyloric artery.

No significant differences were found in other surgical outcomes across artery types.

Abstract

Background/Objectives: During laparoscopic pylorus-preserving gastrectomy (LPPG), the preservation of the infra-pyloric artery (IPA) and dissection of the infra-pyloric lymph node (LN) station 6 are essential, underscoring the importance of understanding the anatomical structure of the IPA. This study aimed to investigate anatomical variations in the IPA and surgical outcomes based on data from a multicenter prospective trial. Methods: A post hoc analysis was conducted based on the Korean Laparoendoscopic Gastrointestinal Surgery Study (KLASS)-04 trial, in which patients randomly underwent LPPG or laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG). The IPA variations were categorized into three groups: distal, caudal, and proximal. Clinicopathological characteristics and surgical outcomes were analyzed according to the IPA type. Results: Among the 192 patients, the distribution of IPA types was as follows: 45 (23.44%) distal, 74 (38.54%) caudal, and 73 (38.02%) proximal. There were no significant differences in the clinicopathological characteristics between the IPA types. Of the 119 patients who underwent LPPG, a significant difference in operative time was observed based on the IPA type, with a longer duration observed with the distal type compared to that of the proximal type (distal type vs. proximal type: 202.5 (150–275) vs. 170 (105–265) min, p = 0.0300). No significant differences were observed in other surgical outcomes. Conclusions: The distribution of IPA types was more diverse than that reported in previous studies. There was a statistically significant difference in the operating time based on the IPA type. Identifying IPA variations during LPPG may be beneficial for gastric cancer surgeons.

Figures