# Reintroduced White Storks ( Ciconia ciconia ) Have Similar Diets to Their Wild Conspecifics

**Authors:** Şeniz Mustafa, Connor T. Panter, Laura Vaughan‐Hirsch, Rachel L. White, Anja Rott

PMC · DOI: 10.1002/ece3.71278 · Ecology and Evolution · 2025-04-11

## TL;DR

Reintroduced white storks in southern England have diets similar to wild storks, suggesting successful adaptation after release.

## Contribution

First quantitative dietary assessment of reintroduced white storks in southern England.

## Key findings

- Wild group pellets were significantly heavier than captive group pellets.
- Wild storks primarily foraged on beetles and earthworms.
- Dietary similarities between reintroduced and wild storks suggest successful acclimatisation.

## Abstract

Understanding a species' diet is crucial for assessing its ecology and can indicate the success of reintroduction efforts. We explored dietary composition and compared pellet morphology and supplementary prey proportions between two white stork (
Ciconia ciconia
) groups to assess reintroduction effectiveness. White stork groups consisted of released individuals that were free flying (i.e., “wild group”) and those kept within a confined enclosure (“captive group”). A total of 23 white stork pellets were collected during the 2023 breeding season. Wild group pellets were significantly heavier (x¯ = 12.7 ± 9.2 g [SD]) than captive group pellets (x¯ = 5.2 ± 2.1 g). As expected, all captive group pellets contained supplementary prey, accounting for 88.4% ± 26.1% of pellet biomass, whereas 73.3% of wild group pellets contained supplementary prey, comprising 52.9% ± 36.3% of pellet biomass. The wild group predominantly foraged on beetles (Coleoptera) and earthworms (Clitellata). Our results represent the first quantitative dietary assessment of reintroduced white storks in southern England. Similarities between our data and that of wild white stork diets from elsewhere in their range suggest successful post‐release acclimatisation at Knepp Estate.

We explored the dietary composition and compared pellet morphology using pellet analysis (n = 23) between two White Stork (
Ciconia ciconia
) groups to assess reintroduction effectiveness that consisted of released individuals that were free flying (i.e., “wild group”) and those kept within a confined enclosure (“captive group”). We found that 60% of the pellets from wild groups contained supplementary prey, making up 53% of the total biomass, and predominantly foraged on beetles (Coleoptera) and earthworms (Clitellata). Similarities between our data and wild White Stork diets from elsewhere in their range suggest successful post‐release acclimatisation at Knepp Estate.

## Linked entities

- **Species:** Ciconia ciconia (taxon 8928), Coleoptera (taxon 7041), Clitellata (taxon 42113)

## Full-text entities

- **Species:** Coleoptera (beetles, order) [taxon 7041], Clitellata (class) [taxon 42113], earthworms (species) [taxon 71170], Ciconia ciconia (White stork, species) [taxon 8928]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11986844/full.md

## Figures

2 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11986844/full.md

## References

92 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11986844/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11986844