Draft genome sequence of Bacillus anthracis strains, isolated from soil samples from a historic tannery site in Upper Austria
Maximilian F. Mayerhofer-Rochel, Florian Himmelbauer, Hans-Jörg Hellinger, Michael P. Szostak, Gregor Grass, Monika Ehling-Schulz

TL;DR
This paper announces the draft genome sequences of four Bacillus anthracis strains found in soil from a historic tannery site in Austria.
Contribution
The study provides new draft genome sequences of B. anthracis isolates from a unique environmental source.
Findings
Four B. anthracis isolates were obtained from soil samples at a historic tannery site.
Draft genome sequences of these isolates were generated and are now available for further analysis.
Abstract
In this announcement, we present the draft genomes of four Bacillus anthracis isolates, MH-MFM, MH-VW, MH-PR, and MH-JJ, originating from soil samples retrieved from a sludge disposal site of a historic tannery site in Upper Austria.
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
| Strain | Chromosome coverage (MinION/Illumina) | Plasmid pXO1 coverage (MinION/Illumina) | Plasmid pXO2 coverage (MinION/Illumina) | Number of contigs pre-polishing | N50 of pre-polished contigs | Length (bp) of chromosome pXO1 and pXO2 | CheckM | GC% | Number of CDS | SRA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MH-MFM | 91×/21× | 347×/58× | 228×/33× | 13 | 3905291 | 5,175,977 | 98.85 | 35.1 | 5,620 |
|
| MH-VW | 41×/37× | 117×/88× | 75×/57× | 5 | 5228373 | 5,228,373 | 99.43 | 35.2 | 5,625 |
|
| MH-PR | 38×/58× | 133×/154× | 81×/94× | 5 | 5228464 | 5,228,464 | 99.43 | 35.2 | 5,627 |
|
| MH-JJ | 78×/19× | 328×/50× | 179×/32× | 8 | 5227439 | 5,227,439 | 99.43 | 35.2 | 5,639 |
|
- —Österreichische Forschungsförderungsgesellschafthttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100004955
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsBacillus and Francisella bacterial research · Identification and Quantification in Food · Bacteriophages and microbial interactions
ANNOUNCEMENT
Bacillus anthracis, a gram-positive, spore-forming bacterium of the Bacillus cereus group, causes the zoonotic disease anthrax and can remain viable in soil for decades. Such sites threaten veterinarian and public health. As the last outbreak of anthrax in Austria occurred at a pasture site in Tyrol in 1988, historic anthrax loci may be a concern for prospective disease monitoring. Soil samples were taken using a hand auger at an abandoned tannery in Upper Austria and were screened for B. anthracis by cultivation on semi-selective agar plates (1). Single colonies of isolates, classified as B. anthracis after confirmation of the presence of B. anthracis-specific markers by real-time PCR assays (2, 3), were stored using Microbank (Pro-Lab Diagnostics Inc., Canada). Canonical single-nucleotide polymorphism-based genotyping revealed that all four isolates belong to A.Br.064, previously not yet associated with Austria (1).
For whole genome sequencing (WGS) analysis, B. anthracis isolates were retrieved from Microbank and grown on StdI agar (Merck KGaA, Germany) at 37°C. DNA from colonies was isolated using the MasterPure Total DNA/RNA Purification kit (Lucigen Middleton, USA) with a pre-lysis step using 24,839 U of Ready-to-Lyse lysozyme solution (Lucigen Middleton, USA) for 60 minutes at 37°C.
Illumina paired-end sequencing was performed using ILMN DNA LP (M) tagmentation (24 Samples, IPB) for library preparation and the MiniSeq Mid Output Kit (300 cycles) on the MiSeq system (Illumina, USA). The run produced 4.64 GB with an average Q30 of 91.57 GB. Nanopore single-end sequencing was performed from the same DNA extract using SQK-LSK109 chemistry on an R10.4.1 flow cell on the MinION system (Oxford Nanopore Technologies, UK), running system software MinKNOW 23.07.8 for the generation of long reads for hybrid assembly. The library (run time: 50 h) resulted in 1.19 million reads, with estimated 2.83 Gb and 6.51 kb N50. Base calling was performed using fast mode with 400 bps settings.
MinION raw reads were assembled using FLYE v.2.9.2-b1786 (4). Illumina raw reads were mapped against the assembled FLYE output using BWA v.0.7.17-r1188 (5) resulting in a hybrid assembly for chromosome, pXO1, and pXO2, respectively. The raw hybrid assembly was polished using Pilon v.1.24 (6). Ragtag v.02.01.00 (7) was used for reference-guided assembly to polish assemblies and reduce the number of contigs (see Table 1) to three (according to chromosome, plasmids pXO1 and pXO2). Default parameters were used for all software.
The polished replicons, corresponding to the chromosome and plasmids pXO1 and pXO2, were subjected to CheckM v.01.02.02 (8), BUSCO v.05.02.2002 (9) with baciallales marker, Geneious Prime v.2023.1.2, and PGAP V2023-10-03.build7061 (10) for a check of completeness, contamination, GC content, and protein coding sequence estimate (Table 1). The 5.2 MB chromosomes were submitted to the pubMLST database (11) to confirm the species classification of B. anthracis.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1Mayerhofer-Rochel MF, Himmelbauer F, Reinprecht P, Herndler S, Weidinger H, Hellinger HJ, Szostak MP, Grass G, Ehling-Schulz M. 2024. Persistence in time: the hunt for Bacillus anthracis at a historic tannery site in Austria reveals genetic diversity thought extinct. Appl Environ Microbiol 0:e 01732-24. doi:10.1128/aem.01732-24PMC 1192134639918319 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 2Wielinga PR, Hamidjaja RA, Agren J, Knutsson R, Segerman B, Fricker M, Ehling-Schulz M, de Groot A, Burton J, Brooks T, Janse I, van Rotterdam B. 2011. A multiplex real-time PCR for identifying and differentiating B. anthracis virulent types. Int J Food Microbiol 145 Suppl 1:S 137–44. doi:10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2010.07.03920826037 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 3Antwerpen MH, Zimmermann P, Bewley K, Frangoulidis D, Meyer H. 2008. Real-time PCR system targeting a chromosomal marker specific for Bacillus anthracis. Mol Cell Probes 22:313–315. doi:10.1016/j.mcp.2008.06.00118602986 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 4Kolmogorov M, Yuan J, Lin Y, Pevzner PA. 2019. Assembly of long, error-prone reads using repeat graphs. Nat Biotechnol 37:540–546. doi:10.1038/s 41587-019-0072-830936562 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 5Li H, Durbin R. 2010. Fast and accurate long-read alignment with Burrows–Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 26:589–595. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp 69820080505 PMC 2828108 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 6Walker BJ, Abeel T, Shea T, Priest M, Abouelliel A, Sakthikumar S, Cuomo CA, Zeng Q, Wortman J, Young SK, Earl AM. 2014. Pilon: an integrated tool for comprehensive microbial variant detection and genome assembly improvement. P Lo S One 9:e 112963. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.011296325409509 PMC 4237348 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 7Alonge M, Lebeigle L, Kirsche M, Jenike K, Ou S, Aganezov S, Wang X, Lippman ZB, Schatz MC, Soyk S. 2022. Automated assembly scaffolding using Rag Tag elevates a new tomato system for high-throughput genome editing. Genome Biol 23:258. doi:10.1186/s 13059-022-02823-736522651 PMC 9753292 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 8Parks DH, Imelfort M, Skennerton CT, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW. 2015. Check M: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res 25:1043–1055. doi:10.1101/gr.186072.11425977477 PMC 4484387 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
