Complete genome sequences of Sellimonas intestinalis JCM 30749T, Sellimonas caecigallum JCM 35759T, and Sellimonas catena JCM 35622T and JCM 35623
Kazuyoshi Koike, Kazutoshi Murotomi, Mayu Hamajima, Dieter M. Tourlousse, Atsushi Hisatomi, Mitsuo Sakamoto, Yuji Sekiguchi

TL;DR
This paper presents the complete genome sequences of four Sellimonas species, providing insights into their genetic structure and composition.
Contribution
The study provides the first complete genome sequences for these four Sellimonas species.
Findings
All four genomes consist of a single circular chromosome.
Genome lengths range from 2,758,996 to 3,825,976 base pairs.
G + C content ranges between 45.12% and 45.59%.
Abstract
We obtained complete genome sequences of Sellimonas intestinalis JCM 30749T, “Sellimonas caecigallum” JCM 35759T, Sellimonas catena JCM 35622T, and Sellimonas catena JCM 35623. All four genomes consist of a single circular chromosome, with lengths of 2,758,996 to 3,825,976 base pairs and G + C contents of 45.12% to 45.59%.
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
| Species |
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Strain | JCM 30749T | JCM 35759T | JCM 35622T | JCM 35623 |
| Accession no. |
|
|
|
|
| Circular genome | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| No. of contigs | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Genome size (bp) | 3,228,050 | 2,758,996 | 3,825,976 | 3,801,783 |
| GC content (%) | 45.37 | 45.12 | 45.49 | 45.59 |
| No. of reads | 110,509 | 216,034 | 140,072 | 302,965 |
| N50 of reads (bases) | 15,322 | 5,607 | 13,103 | 9,245 |
| Coverage (×) | 279 | 288 | 286 | 480 |
| Completeness (%) | 98.83 | 99.42 | 98.25 | 98.25 |
| Contamination (%) | 0.88 | 0.68 | 1.17 | 1.17 |
| Genes (total) | 3,138 | 2,674 | 3,793 | 3,766 |
| CDSs (total) | 3,058 | 2,594 | 3,713 | 3,683 |
| Genes (coding) | 3,008 | 2,552 | 3,600 | 3,578 |
| CDSs (with protein) | 3,008 | 2,552 | 3,600 | 3,578 |
| Genes (RNA) | 80 | 80 | 80 | 83 |
| rRNAs (5S, 16S, 23S) | 5, 5, 5 | 5, 5, 5 | 5, 5, 5 | 5, 5, 5 |
| Complete rRNAs (5S, 16S, 23S) | 5, 5, 5 | 5, 5, 5 | 5, 5, 5 | 5, 5, 5 |
| tRNAs | 61 | 61 | 61 | 64 |
| ncRNAs | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
- —Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED)
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies · Bacteriophages and microbial interactions · Plant Disease Resistance and Genetics
ANNOUNCEMENT
The genus Sellimonas is a recently cultured, gram-positive bacterium within the family Lachnospiraceae, commonly found in the human gut, and is of increasing interest because of its potential impact on human health (1). After reclassification of S. monacensis (2), the genus currently contains two validly described species, namely, S. intestinalis and S. catena (1, 3), as well as two additional effectively published taxa, namely, “Candidatus Sellimonas avistercoris” and “S. caecigallum” (4, 5). The role of Sellimonas in health is complex, with studies suggesting both harmful (e.g., depressive symptoms [6]) and protective (e.g., type 2 diabetes mellitus risk (7) and posttraumatic stress disorder risk [8]) associations. It may serve as a biomarker for gut homeostasis (9) and dysbiosis (10, 11), highlighting its dual influence on health. In this study, we generated complete genome sequences of the type strains of S. intestinalis (strain JCM 30749^T^), “S. caecigallum” (strain JCM 35759^T^), and S. catena (strain JCM 35622^T^), as well as S. catena JCM 35623. These strains were previously isolated from human feces (JCM 30749^T^, JCM 35622^T^, and JCM 35623) or chicken cecum (JCM 35759^T^).
Cells were obtained from the Japan Collection of Microorganisms (JCM) and cultured anaerobically in the GAM medium at 37℃ under an atmosphere of N_2_:CO_2_ (80:20, vol/vol). Genomic DNA was extracted from overnight cultures using the Nanobind CBB kit RT (PacBio, Melon Park, CA, USA), following the manufacturer’s protocol, and integrity (peak size of >20 kbp) verified using an Agilent gDNA ScreenTape System with a 4200 TapeStation device (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Sequencing libraries were prepared using ONT’s Native Barcoding Kit 24 (SQK-NBD114.24; Oxford Nanopore Technologies, Oxford, UK), without fragmentation and following the manufacturer’s protocol, and sequenced on an R10.4.1 flow cell with a GridION device (Oxford Nanopore Technologies). For all bioinformatics analyses, default parameters were used, unless indicated below. Basecalling was performed using Dorado v0.6.2 with model [email protected] (https://github.com/nanoporetech/dorado). Concatenated reads were identified and split using Duplex Tools v0.3.1 (https://github.com/nanoporetech/duplex-tools). Read data were subsequently demultiplexed using the guppy_barcoder command in Guppy v6.5.7 (Oxford Nanopore Technologies) with concurrent trimming of barcodes (options -enable_trim_barcodes -barcode_kits SQK-NBD114-24). Reads with an average quality of <12 and length of <1,000 bases were discarded using NanoFilt v2.8.0 (12). This yielded 110,509–302,965 reads (793,628,272 to 1,823,353,810 total bases, with average lengths of 3,673–8,149 bases, Table 1). Genome assemblies were generated using Flye v2.9.1 (13), resulting in a single circular contig (as indicated by Flye) for all strains. The assemblies were then directly polished with Medaka v1.7.3 (https://github.com/nanoporetech/medaka) using model r1041_e82_400bps_sup_v4.0.0. Completeness (98.25%–99.42%) and contamination (0.68%–1.17%) were evaluated with the CheckM v1.1.3 lineage_wf (14) (Table 1). Annotation was performed using the NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline v6.8 (15).
The genomes of all four strains consist of single circular chromosome (2,758,996–3,825,976 bp with 45.12–45.59% G + C contents, Table 1). The genomes were annotated to contain 2,674–3,793 protein-coding sequences (Table 1). We expect that these complete genomes of Sellimonas species may provide a more reliable basis for exploring their roles in the human gastrointestinal tract.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1Seo B, Yoo JE, Lee YM, Ko G. 2016. Sellimonas intestinalis gen. nov., sp. nov., isolated from human faeces. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 66:951–956. doi:10.1099/ijsem.0.00081726637816 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 2Hisatomi A, Kastawa NWEPG, Song I, Ohkuma M, Fukiya S, Sakamoto M. 2023. Claveliimonas bilis gen. nov., sp. nov., deoxycholic acid-producing bacteria isolated from human faeces, and reclassification of Sellimonas monacensis Zenner et al. 2021 as Claveliimonas monacensis comb. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 73. doi:10.1099/ijsem.0.00603037737068 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 3Hisatomi A, Ohkuma M, Sakamoto M. 2023. Sellimonas catena sp. nov., isolated from human faeces. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 73. doi:10.1099/ijsem.0.00585337185104 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 4Gilroy R, Ravi A, Getino M, Pursley I, Horton DL, Alikhan N-F, Baker D, Gharbi K, Hall N, Watson M, Adriaenssens EM, Foster-Nyarko E, Jarju S, Secka A, Antonio M, Oren A, Chaudhuri RR, La Ragione R, Hildebrand F, Pallen MJ. 2021. Extensive microbial diversity within the chicken gut microbiome revealed by metagenomics and culture. Peer J 9:e 10941. doi:10.7717/peerj.1094133868800 PMC 8035907 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 5Wongkuna S, Ghimire S, Antony L, Chankhamhaengdecha S, Janvilisri T, Scaria J. 2020. Sellimonas caecigallum sp. nov., description and genome sequence of a new member of the Sellimonas genus isolated from the cecum of feral chicken. New Microbes New Infect 33:100626. doi:10.1016/j.nmni.2019.10062631993203 PMC 6974783 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 6Radjabzadeh D, Bosch JA, Uitterlinden AG, Zwinderman AH, Ikram MA, van Meurs JBJ, Luik AI, Nieuwdorp M, Lok A, van Duijn CM, Kraaij R, Amin N. 2022. Gut microbiome-wide association study of depressive symptoms. Nat Commun 13:7128. doi:10.1038/s 41467-022-34502-336473852 PMC 9726982 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 7Song S, Zhang Q, Zhang L, Zhou X, Yu J. 2024. A two-sample bidirectional Mendelian randomization analysis investigates associations between gut microbiota and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Front Endocrinol 15:1313651. doi:10.3389/fendo.2024.1313651 PMC 1094033638495787 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 8He Q, Wang W, Xu D, Xiong Y, Tao C, You C, Ma L, Ma J, Psychiatric Genomics Consortium Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Working Group. 2024. Potential causal association between gut microbiome and posttraumatic stress disorder. Transl Psychiatry 14:67. doi:10.1038/s 41398-024-02765-738296956 PMC 10831060 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
