Draft genomes of three bacteria capable of growing on cocamidopropyl betaine or N,N,N-trimethylglycine (betaine): Cupriavidus sp. CuC1, Variovorax sp. VaC1, and Pseudomonas sp. PsB
Jinha Kim, Arum Han, Kung-Hui Chu

TL;DR
This paper presents draft genomes of three bacteria that can grow on specific types of betaine compounds.
Contribution
The study provides new draft genomes of bacteria with unique growth capabilities on betaine derivatives.
Findings
Pseudomonas sp. PsB can grow on betaine but not on cocamidopropyl betaine.
Cupriavidus sp. CuC1 and Variovorax sp. VaC1 can grow only on cocamidopropyl betaine.
The genomes of these bacteria were sequenced and reported.
Abstract
We report three draft genome sequences of Pseudomonas sp. PsB, Cupriavidus sp. CuC1, and Variovorax sp. VaC1. Pseudomonas sp. PsB can grow on N,N,N-trimethylglycine (betaine), but not on cocamidopropyl betaine (CPB), as a sole carbon source. Cupriavidus sp. CuC1 and Variovorax sp. VaC1 can grow only on CPB.
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
| Features | CuC1 | VaC1 | PsB |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sequence Read Archive accession # |
|
|
|
| Total sequenced library length (bp) | 5,055,303,900 | 4,473,307,200 | 4,801,127,400 |
| Assembly accession # |
|
|
|
| Number of contigs | 473 | 33 | 106 |
| Assembly length (bp) | 10,946,258 | 6,938,278 | 6,425,053 |
| Number of pair-end reads (trimmed and aligned) | 14,096,932 | 12,810,382 | 14,066,831 |
| Genome coverage | 381× | 545× | 650× |
| Contig | 57,476 | 987,950 | 168,335 |
| Contig | 64 | 3 | 1 |
| Guanine–cytosine content (%) | 64.5 | 67 | 62.5 |
| Completeness (%) | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| Contamination (%) | 6.42 | 0.63 | 0.3 |
| Number of coding sequences (CDS) | 10,382 | 6,390 | 5,953 |
| Number of CDS with proteins | 9,913 | 6,358 | 5,838 |
| Number of complete rRNA genes (5S, 16S, 23S) | 3, 1, 0 | 1, 0, 1 | 2, 0, 0 |
| Number of predicted tRNAs | 63 | 67 | 44 |
- —Strategic Environmental Research and Development Programhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100013316
- —Texas A&M Universityhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100007904
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies · Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology · Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
ANNOUNCEMENT
Cocamidopropyl betaine (CPB) is a surfactant used in cosmetic products (1), anaerobic digestion processes (2), nanoparticle stabilization (3), and aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF) formulants (4, 5). N,N,N-trimethylglycine (betaine) could potentially be used as an anti-freeze agent in AFFF concentrates (4), is a common osmolyte, and known as a crucial metabolite in bacteria (6, 7). Here, we report three draft genomes of Pseudomonas sp. strain PsB, Cupriavidus sp. strain CuC1, and Variovorax sp. strain VaC1 isolated from CPB- or betaine-enriched soil cultures capable of degrading fluorotelomer-based precursors (8).
The soil enrichment culture was first established in a 20 mL vial containing 2 mL ammonia mineral salt (AMS) media (9), 0.05% CPB as the sole carbon source, and homogenized sandy soil (0.1 g) collected at a depth of 91–203 cm near a former Air Force base (10). The vial was shaken at 160 rpm at room temperature for a week before daily subcultures using 5% passage of the enriched culture to a new vial. The CPB enrichment was used as inoculum to establish a betaine-degrading culture with 5 mM betaine in AMS media. Strains CuC1 and VaC1 were isolated from AMS agar plates amended with CPB. Strain PsB was isolated with betaine as the carbon source. The isolates grew in AMS media with 0.05% CPB (CuC1 and VaC1) or 5 mM betaine (PsB). The FastDNA SPIN Kit for Soil (MP Biomedicals, CA) was used for extracting genomic DNAs (gDNAs). The 16S rRNA genes were amplified using the 24F/1492R primer set. Eton Biosciences (San Diego, CA) performed the paired-end Sanger sequencing. The trimmed paired-end reads were merged through VSEARCH (11). Through BLAST (12), CuC1 (PQ396171), VaC1 (PQ443692), and PsB (PQ443691) were closely associated with Cupriavidus sp. BD0822-70LYW1-18 (LC515384.1; 100%), Variovorax sp. AFS004558 (OP986438.1; 99.57%) and Pseudomonas plecoglossicida NBRC 103162 (NR_114226.1; 99.93%), respectively.
Cell suspensions originally inoculated with the same colonies were again used for gDNA extraction. The gDNAs were extracted using the PureLink Genomic DNA Kit (Life Technologies, CA) and quantified using Qubit Fluorometer 4.0 (Invitrogen, CA). The gDNA quality was checked with the D1000 ScreenTape Assay Kit (Agilent, CA) on the 4200 TapeStation (Agilent, CA). Libraries were prepared and quality-controlled with the NEBNext Ultra II DNA Library Preparation Kit (New England Biolabs, MA) and the KAPA Library Quantification Kit (Roche, Basel, Switzerland), respectively. Paired-end 2 × 150 bp sequencing was performed through the Illumina NovaSeq X platform (Illumina, CA). Raw reads were trimmed via Trimmomatic v0.4 (13). The genomes were de novo assembled using SPAdes v4.0.0 (14). Contigs with length < 500 bp and 77-mer coverage < 5 were removed (https://github.com/ECBSU/oneliners). Statistical information was retrieved using QUAST v5.2.0 (15). Completeness and contamination were checked through CheckM2 v1.0.2 (16). The genome coverages (i.e., total length of trimmed and aligned pair-end reads/total assembly length) were calculated using SAMtools v1.21 (17) after the paired-end reads were aligned against the filtered contigs using Bowtie2 v2.5.3 (18). Contigs were submitted to NCBI and annotated through the NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline v6.8 (19). The genomic features of the isolated strains are provided in Table 1.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1Burnett CL, Bergfeld WF, Belsito DV, Hill RA, Klaassen CD, Liebler D, Marks JG, Shank RC, Slaga TJ, Snyder PW, Andersen FA. 2012. Final report of the Cosmetic Ingredient Review Expert Panel on the safety assessment of cocamidopropyl betaine (CAPB). Int J Toxicol 31:77S–111S. doi:10.1177/109158181244720222869896 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 2Zhou Y, Guo B, Mao J, Xia S. 2021. Key role of soluble microbial products in waste activated sludge reduction by synergetic combination of cocoamidopropyl betaine and alkalinity in the short-time aerobic digestion system. J Hazard Mater 408:124930. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.12493033387723 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 3Blinov AV, Nagdalian AA, Siddiqui SA, Maglakelidze DG, Gvozdenko AA, Blinova AA, Yasnaya MA, Golik AB, Rebezov MB, Jafari SM, Shah MA. 2022. Synthesis and characterization of selenium nanoparticles stabilized with cocamidopropyl betaine. Sci Rep 12:21975. doi:10.1038/s 41598-022-25884-x 36539549 PMC 9763805 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 4Peshoria S, Nandini D. 2022. Chapter 7: Understanding Aqueous Film-forming Foam Components. In Améduri B (ed), Perfluoroalkyl Substances: Synthesis, Applications, Challenges and Regulations. The Royal Society of Chemistry.
- 5Jahura FT, Mazumder N-U-S, Hossain MT, Kasebi A, Girase A, Ormond RB. 2024. Exploring the prospects and challenges of fluorine-free firefighting foams (F 3) as alternatives to aqueous film-forming foams (AFFF): a review. ACS Omega 9:37430–37444. doi:10.1021/acsomega.4c 0367339281906 PMC 11391440 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 6Zou H, Chen N, Shi M, Xian M, Song Y, Liu J. 2016. The metabolism and biotechnological application of betaine in microorganism. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 100:3865–3876. doi:10.1007/s 00253-016-7462-327005411 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 7Sleator RD, Hill C. 2002. Bacterial osmoadaptation: the role of osmolytes in bacterial stress and virulence. FEMS Microbiol Rev 26:49–71. doi:10.1111/j.1574-6976.2002.tb 00598.x 12007642 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 8Kim J, Leonard SW, Van Meter MI, Kim-Fu ML, Cao D, Field JA, Chu K-H. 2024. Nexus of soil microbiomes, genes, classes of carbon substrates, and biotransformation of fluorotelomer-based precursors. Environ Sci Technol 58:20553–20565. doi:10.1021/acs.est.4c 0647139501641 PMC 11580179 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
