Editorial: thematic issue on interactions across microbial ecosystems
Søren J Sørensen, Kornelia Smalla, Mette Burmølle, Itzhak Mizrahi

Abstract
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMicrobial Community Ecology and Physiology
Microorganisms are the foundation of all ecosystems, driving biogeochemical cycles, maintaining ecosystem stability, and shaping host physiology. Their interactions—with each other, with hosts, and with their environment—are central to microbial ecology. The 16th Symposium on Bacterial Genetics and Ecology (BAGECO), held in Copenhagen, Denmark, from 26 to 30 June 2023, brought together researchers from across the world to explore these complex microbial interactions. The theme of Interactions Across Microbial Ecosystems reflected the growing recognition that microbial communities are rarely isolated but instead dynamically interact across ecosystems. Whether in natural environments, host-associated microbiomes, or engineered systems, microbes engage in competition, cooperation, and gene exchange, with consequences for biodiversity and function. This thematic issue of FEMS Microbial Ecology presents seven selected studies that provide novel insights into these interactions, highlighting the breadth and interdisciplinary nature of modern microbial ecology.
Aligning with the topics of the BAGECO23 symposium, the studies featured in this issue address fundamental questions about microbial interactions in both natural and engineered ecosystems. Microbial communities in terrestrial and aquatic habitats are constantly influenced by environmental changes, including climate-driven disturbances and anthropogenic pressures. Masch et al. (2025) investigate how bark beetle infestations in Picea abies (Norway spruce) forests alter fungal communities across different habitats (soil, litter, and wood). By examining shifts in mycobiome diversity and function, their work highlights how tree dieback cascades through the ecosystem, with implications for nutrient cycling and forest health. This research aligns with broader efforts to understand how environmental disturbances reshape microbial communities, particularly in the context of climate change (Stursová et al. 2014, Cavicchioli et al. 2019). Similarly, Vass et al. (2024) explore microbial community coalescence in estuarine environments, demonstrating that the mixing of freshwater and marine communities enhances microbial diversity and ecological stability. Their findings contribute to the growing body of research on microbial dispersal and resilience, emphasizing that repeated mixing events may play a role in stabilizing ecosystems under environmental fluctuations (Rilling et al Jansson and Hofmockel 2020, Herren and McMahon 2017).
In host-associated microbiomes, microbial interactions influence health, development, and ecological function, but disruptions to these relationships can have far-reaching consequences (McFall-Ngai et al. 2013). Giraud et al. (2024) examine the active prokaryotic communities associated with shrimp larvae (Penaeus stylirostris) in aquaculture settings, revealing how environmental factors shape microbial assemblages and identifying potential probiotic strains that could contribute to improved disease resistance. Their findings align with the broader understanding of microbial dysbiosis in aquaculture, where imbalances in microbial communities can lead to increased disease susceptibility (Vadstein et al. 2018). In contrast, Bodkhe et al. (2024) investigate microbiome inheritance in Caenorhabditis elegans, demonstrating that dauer larvae—a stress-resistant stage—are largely devoid of gut bacteria. Their study challenges the assumption that host-associated microbiomes are continuously transmitted across generations, suggesting that stress-induced developmental transitions can act as bottlenecks in microbial inheritance and potentially influence host–microbe coevolution (Shapira 2017).
Beyond natural and host-associated ecosystems, microbial interactions are also key to engineered environments, where they mediate pollutant degradation, biofilm formation, and secondary metabolite production (Timmis et al. 2017). Martin et al. (2024) investigate microbial communities in moving bed biofilm reactors (MBBRs) under increasing micropollutant concentrations. Their findings demonstrate that while biofilm-associated prokaryotes adapt and maintain functional activity under chemical stress, numbers of protozoa decline, highlighting the differential resilience of bacteria and their protozoan grazers in wastewater treatment systems. Understanding these microbial responses is crucial for optimizing bioremediation and wastewater management strategies (Flemming et al. 2016). Meanwhile, Buijs et al. (2024) introduce SecMet-FISH, a fluorescence-based technique for detecting and visualizing secondary metabolite-producing microorganisms. By combining fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with gene-targeted probes, their method provides a powerful tool for linking microbial function to phylogeny in complex environmental samples, opening new possibilities for studying microbial competition and chemical signalling in microbial communities (Foster and Bell 2012, Steen et al. 2019).
In addition to empirical studies, theoretical and conceptual perspectives remain essential for advancing microbial ecology. Geesink et al. (2024) provide an important perspective on microbial interactions, arguing that beyond direct pairwise exchanges, microbial interactions create emergent effects that shape entire ecosystems. Their work emphasizes that metabolic cross-feeding, biofilm formation, and chemical signalling generate cascading influences on microbial networks, which should be considered when studying microbial community assembly and function. These emerging secondary effects of microbial interactions have been recognized in microbiome research (Coyte et al. 2015) but require further integration into ecological and evolutionary models.
The research presented in this thematic issue reflects the diversity and dynamism of microbial ecology, spanning from host-associated microbiomes to environmental and engineered ecosystems. Collectively, these seven studies highlight the complexity of microbial interactions and emphasize the importance of interdisciplinary approaches in understanding microbial life. We extend our gratitude to the authors for their contributions and to the reviewers for their valuable feedback. We hope that this thematic issue inspires further research on the intricate web of microbial interactions that shape our world.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1Bodkhe R, Trang K, Hammond S et al. Emergence of dauer larvae in Caenorhabditis elegans disrupts continuity of host–microbiome interactions. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2024;100: fiae 149. 10.1093/femsec/fiae 149.39516048 PMC 11590253 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 2Buijs Y, Geers AU, Nita I et al. Sec Met-FISH: labeling, visualization, and enumeration of secondary metabolite producing microorganisms. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2024;100:fiae 03810.1093/femsec/fiae 038.38490742 PMC 11004939 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 3Cavicchioli R, Ripple WJ, Timmis KN et al. Scientists' warning to humanity: microorganisms and climate change. Nat Rev Micro. 2019;17:569–86. 10.1038/s 41579-019-0222-5.PMC 713617131213707 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 4Coyte KZ, Schluter J, Foster KR. The ecology of the microbiome: networks, competition, and stability. Science. 2015;350:663–6. 10.1126/science.aad 2602.26542567 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 5Flemming HC, Wingender J, Szewzyk U et al. Biofilms: an emergent form of bacterial life. Nat Rev Micro. 2016;14:563–75. 10.1038/nrmicro.2016.94.27510863 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 6Foster KR, Bell T. Competition, not cooperation, dominates interactions in microbial communities. Curr Biol. 2012;22:1845–50. 10.1016/j.cub.2012.08.005.22959348 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 7Geesink P, Ter Horst J, Ettema TJG. More than the sum of its parts: uncovering emerging effects of microbial interactions in complex communities. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2024;100:fiae 029. 10.1093/femsec/fiae 029.38444203 PMC 10950044 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 8Giraud C, Wabete N, Lemeu C et al. Environmental factors and potential probiotic lineages shape the active prokaryotic communities associated with healthy Penaeus stylirostris larvae and their rearing water. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2024;100:fiae 156. 10.1093/femsec/fiae 156.39562288 PMC 11636268 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
