Safety and efficacy of different rotational speed during rotational atherectomy in coronary heart disease patients (RACE): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
Jie Xu, Yu-wei Wang, Li-Kun Ma, Hao Hu, Hong-Wu Chen, Jing-Sheng Hua, Xiang-Yong Kong, Dan Li, Long-Wei Li, Jia-Wei Wu

TL;DR
This study tests different rotational speeds during a heart procedure to see which is safer and more effective for patients with severe artery calcification.
Contribution
The study introduces a randomized trial comparing low-speed, high-speed, and combined rotational speed protocols in rotational atherectomy.
Findings
The trial will assess complication rates and outcomes of different RA rotational speeds in coronary calcification.
Findings may influence standardization of RA protocols and improve patient outcomes.
Intravascular imaging and 1-year follow-up will evaluate long-term effects of rotational speed choices.
Abstract
The increasing incidence of coronary heart disease, driven by socio-economic development and population aging, poses significant challenges. Coronary calcification, a major factor complicating percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI), often necessitates rotational atherectomy (RA) for lesion preparation. However, the impact of different RA rotational speeds on procedural and clinical outcomes remains unclear. While low-speed RA (LSRA) has been suggested to reduce intraoperative slow flow, evidence is inconsistent, and the benefits of combining LSRA with high-speed RA (HSRA) are not well established. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of different rotational speed protocols to guide clinical practice. This single-center, randomized controlled trial will target patients with severe coronary artery calcification scheduled for RA. An estimated 210 patients will be enrolled…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCoronary Interventions and Diagnostics · Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics · Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
