Patient and healthcare professionals’ perception of weekly prophylactic catheter washout in adults living with long-term catheters: qualitative study of the CATHETER II trial
Sheela Tripathee, Mohamed Abdel-Fattah, Diana Johnson, Lynda Constable, Seonaidh Cotton, David Cooper, Graeme MacLennan, Suzanne Evans, Amanda Young, Konstantinos Dimitropoulos, Hashim Hashim, Mary Kilonzo, James Hugh Larcombe, Paul Little, Peter Murchie, Phyo Kyaw Myint

TL;DR
This study explores how patients and healthcare professionals view weekly catheter washouts to prevent complications in adults with long-term catheters.
Contribution
The study provides insights into the acceptability and feasibility of self-managed catheter washouts in a real-world setting.
Findings
Participants found weekly catheter washouts feasible and reported reduced blockage, pain, and infection.
Training improved participants' confidence and ability to perform washouts independently.
Healthcare professionals confirmed participants' adherence to the washout protocol.
Abstract
To explore trial participants’ experience of long-term catheters (LTC), the acceptability of washout policies, their experience of the CATHETER II trial (a randomised controlled trial comparing the clinical effectiveness of various washout policies versus no washout policy in preventing catheter associated complications in adults living with long-term catheters) and their satisfaction with the outcomes. The objectives of the healthcare professionals (HCPs) focus group and interview were to explore their attitudes towards weekly prophylactic catheter washout, views on the provision of training and participants’ ability to enact washout behaviours. A longitudinal qualitative study embedded within the CATHETER II randomised controlled trial, which included semi-structured interviews and focus groups with participants from multiple trial sites. Data were analysed using the Theoretical…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsUrinary Tract Infections Management · Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare · Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
