# Application of a practical methodology for the selection of suitable value chains to produce circular fertilisers from secondary raw materials

## TL;DR

This paper introduces a methodology to identify and select the most promising circular fertilizer value chains in Europe to reduce reliance on conventional fertilizers.

## Contribution

A two-stage methodology combining a funnelling process and scoring system is developed to evaluate circular fertilizer value chains.

## Key findings

- The methodology evaluated 48 value chains and identified seven as most promising for agriculture.
- Struvite from urban and industrial wastewater and composted biowaste were among the top options.
- The approach uses 16 criteria across two stages to filter and score value chains.

## Abstract

The growing demand for food products, driven by a growing world population, has increased Europe's dependence on conventional fertilizers, which have a high impact on the environment. In the last decade, new circular fertilizer value chains have appeared as promising alternatives to conventional fertilizers.

Because of the huge number of alternatives, this study aimed to develop a practical methodology that facilitates the analysis of data related to each value chain to identify and select the most promising circular fertilizer value chains to promote their wide-scale production and use in agriculture, replacing the dependence on conventional fertilizers in Europe. This methodology is based on two stages (funnelling process and scoring system) and considers the 16 criteria defined in the study. The methodology was tested for 48 value chains identified during the mapping of secondary raw materials in Europe with the potential to be used as circular fertilizers when processed, classifying them into seven different raw materials: urban wastewater (UWW), industrial wastewater (IWW), sewage sludge (SS), biowaste (BW), biological by-products (BBP), treated manure (TM), and digestate (DIG). The funnelling process is based on a GO/NO-GO approach that meets six criteria and allows the discarding of 18 value chains, from 30 to the second stage. The scoring system was a more complete analysis, including ten new scoring criteria.

This system allowed the identification of the potential of the value chains analyzed, concluding that struvite from UWW, struvite from IWW, stabilized sludge from SS, composted biowaste from BW, feather meal from BBP, solid fraction from DIG, and spent mushroom substrate from TM are the most promising options for agriculture.

The develop methodology was used to evaluate 48 different value chains with the potential to generate promising circular fertlizers. Seven value chains were finally selected.