Publisher Correction: Dynamics and development of interhemispheric conflict solving in pigeons
Martina Manns, Kevin Haselhuhn, Nadja Freund

Abstract
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 2
Figure 4
Figure 6Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAnimal Nutrition and Physiology
Correction to: Scientific Reports 10.1038/s41598-024-85058-9, published online: 11 January 2025
In the original version of this Article, Figures 2, 4 and 6 were incorrectly displayed.Fig. 2. Super stimuli discrimination under different seeing conditions—(A) mean percent decisions for positive superstimuli (SS +); (B) mean reaction time in seconds [s] when pecking onto SS +. Bars indicate standard error, circles indicate individual data; **p < 0.001, **p < 0.01 according to t-tests for dependent samples (A) or Wilcoxon tests (B).Fig. 4. Hemispheric-specific decisions under binocular seeing conditions in light-exposed and light-deprived pigeons (A), under different seeing conditions (B), during first and all session (C). Bars represent standard error; () < 0.1, * < 0.05; *p 0 < 0.01, *** = p < 0.001 according to posthoc Bonferroni tests (B), Wilcoxon test (C).Fig. 6. Mean reaction times under the different seeing conditions (A); comparison of response latencies for pecking onto correct superstimuli (SS +) and conflict stimuli during the first and all session in light exposed (B) and light-deprived pigeons (C) Bars represent standard error ( < 0.05, ** < 0.01, *** < 0.001 according to Wilcoxon tests).
The original Figures 2, 4 and 6 and the accompanying legends appear below.
The original Article has been corrected.
