# Validity and reliability of the Dietary Sodium Restriction Questionnaire in peritoneal dialysis patients

**Authors:** Yunyao Lin, Ruolin Li, Zhihao Chen, Yingxin Xie, Junyan Fang, Pu Li, Mingzi Chu, Yingli Liu

PMC · DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0321177 · PLOS One · 2025-04-04

## TL;DR

This study adapted and validated a questionnaire to assess sodium diet adherence in peritoneal dialysis patients, showing it is reliable and valid.

## Contribution

The study developed and validated a PD-specific version of the Dietary Sodium Restriction Questionnaire for Chinese patients.

## Key findings

- The PD-DSRQ showed strong internal consistency with Cronbach’s α coefficients above 0.79.
- Content and construct validity were confirmed through expert evaluation and factor analysis.
- The questionnaire explained 64.32% of the variance with three consistent factors.

## Abstract

The Chinese version of Dietary Sodium Restriction Questionnaire (DSRQ) was adapted to evaluate its reliability and validity for measuring adherence to a sodium-restricted diet in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients.

Specific items related to peritoneal dialysis were added to create a PD version of the DSRQ (PD-DSRQ), which was administered to 135 patients undergoing PD. Item analysis was performed using the critical ratio and homogeneity tests. The reliability of the questionnaire was determined by assessing the internal consistency. Content validity was evaluated using the expert evaluation method, and construct validity was assessed via exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses.

The item analysis revealed correlation coefficients (R-values) ranging from 0.311 to 0.745 for each item, with statistically significant differences between the high and low subgroups for all items. The Cronbach’s α coefficients for the overall PD-DSRQ and the attitude, subjective norm, and perceived behavioral control subscales were 0.805, 0.892, 0.794, and 0.889, respectively. The item-level content validity index ranged from 0.83 to 1.00, and the scale-level content validity index/universal agreement was 0.9894. Exploratory factor analysis identified a three-factor structure consistent with the original DSRQ, except for Question 18. The three factors had eigenvalues of 5.302, 4.179, and 1.290, which explained 64.32% of the variance. The average variance extracted for each dimension was 0.5777, 0.5654, and 0.5259, and the composite reliability values were 0.8864, 0.7956, and 0.8802, respectively, demonstrating good convergent and discriminant validity.

The PD-DSRQ encompasses general information and three dimensions: attitude, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control. The questionnaire demonstrated strong reliability and validity, making it a reliable tool for assessing adherence to sodium-restricted diets in patients undergoing PD.

## Full-text entities

- **Chemicals:** Sodium (MESH:D012964)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11970638/full.md

## Figures

2 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11970638/full.md

## References

42 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11970638/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11970638