# Evidence available and used by the Food and Drug Administration for the approval of orphan and nonorphan drugs

**Authors:** Amanda J Koong, Veronica L Irvin, Aditya Narayan, Sujin Song, Robert M Kaplan

PMC · DOI: 10.1093/haschl/qxaf057 · Health Affairs Scholar · 2025-03-18

## TL;DR

This study compares the evidence used by the FDA to approve orphan and nonorphan drugs, finding that orphan drugs rely on fewer and less complete studies.

## Contribution

The study provides empirical evidence on the differences in clinical trial data for FDA-approved orphan versus nonorphan drugs.

## Key findings

- Orphan drugs were approved based on significantly fewer studies compared to nonorphan drugs.
- A smaller proportion of studies for orphan drugs were completed before FDA approval.
- Orphan drugs were less likely to be evaluated in randomized clinical trials.

## Abstract

There are substantial financial incentives to develop orphan drugs for rare diseases, but concerns about the quality and volume of supporting evidence have emerged. We compare evidence used to evaluate orphan and nonorphan drugs approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) between 2016 and 2023. This retrospective cross-sectional analysis utilizes FDA data on approvals and study information from ClinicalTrials.gov to compare characteristics of studies relevant to orphan and nonorphan drugs approved between 2016 and 2023. Of the 368 total drugs approved, 50% were orphan drugs. The FDA-approved drugs based on significantly fewer studies for orphan (1.5 studies/drug) compared to nonorphan (2.4 studies/drug). Additionally, a significantly lower proportion of studies were completed before FDA approval for orphan drugs (25% vs 41%). Orphan drugs were significantly less likely to be evaluated in randomized clinical trials (RCTs) (34% vs 63%). Of these RCTs, there were significantly fewer completed before approval (40% vs 54%) and that had results posted (35% vs 53%). There was a significant difference in the available evidence for orphan and nonorphan drugs. As new legislation like Cures 2.0 is developed, it is critical to examine the balance between an expedited approval timeline and the standard of clinical evidence.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** rare diseases (MESH:D035583)

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11970248/full.md

## Figures

2 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11970248/full.md

## References

34 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11970248/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11970248