# An analysis of US net cancer drug launch prices and clinical efficacy and certainty of evidence from 2008 to 2022

**Authors:** Sumaya Abuloha, Benjamin P Harvey, Shu Niu, Alaa Alshehri, Melissa Miri, Katherine Clifford, James Chambers, Mikael Svensson

PMC · DOI: 10.1093/haschl/qxaf051 · Health Affairs Scholar · 2025-03-13

## TL;DR

Cancer drug prices in the US have doubled from 2008 to 2022, but higher prices do not correlate with better patient outcomes or stronger clinical evidence.

## Contribution

This study is the first to systematically analyze the relationship between US cancer drug prices and clinical efficacy over a 15-year period.

## Key findings

- Cancer drug net launch prices in the US increased from $100,000 to $200,000 between 2008 and 2022.
- Higher drug prices were not associated with greater clinical efficacy or stronger evidence of effectiveness.
- The findings suggest that US cancer drug pricing may not be based on value or patient benefit.

## Abstract

Over the last 15 years, cancer drug prices have increased substantially in the United States (US), with question marks on whether this can be justified based on improved patient outcomes. This study aimed to analyze the relationship between US cancer drug net launch prices and clinical efficacy and certainty of evidence. FDA-approved cancer drug indications from 2008 to 2022 were extracted and matched with net launch price data, 5 distinct measures of clinical efficacy, and measures on the certainty of evidence around the clinical efficacy. Descriptive statistics and linear regression models were used to assess if higher net launch prices were associated with better patient outcomes. Cancer drug launch prices (net per 1 year/course of treatment) have increased from around $100 000 in 2008 to $200 000 in 2022. The results did not support the idea that drugs with higher net launch prices had more impressive clinical efficacy or more robust evidence around the clinical efficacy. US cancer launch prices do not seem to be value-based, which may imply distorted incentives for the allocation of research and development investments.

## Linked entities

- **Diseases:** cancer (MONDO:0004992)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** Cancer (MESH:D009369)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11970244/full.md

## Figures

2 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11970244/full.md

## References

40 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11970244/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11970244