# Ambulance Service Utilization by Kidney Transplant Recipients

## TL;DR

This study examines ambulance use among kidney transplant recipients in Nova Scotia, finding that nearly half used ambulance services to reach the emergency department, with factors like diabetes and donor age playing a role.

## Contribution

The study identifies specific predictors of ambulance use and investigates its impact on graft failure and mortality in kidney transplant recipients.

## Key findings

- 42.8% of kidney transplant recipients used ambulance services to reach the emergency department.
- Female sex, diabetes-related kidney failure, and donor age ≥45 were significant predictors of ambulance use.
- Ambulance use within 30 days of discharge did not significantly increase the risk of graft failure or mortality.

## Abstract

Compared with the general population, kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) frequently visit the emergency department (ED), but much less is known about the characteristics of ED presentations requiring ambulance transport and the impact on subsequent outcomes for KTRs.

To identify predictors of ambulance transport to the ED (ambulance-ED) and outcomes (graft failure and mortality) for those who experienced an ambulance-ED event in a cohort of KTRs.

Retrospective cohort study of incident, adult KTRs receiving a transplant from 2008 to 2020.

Nova Scotia, Canada.

Adult (≥18 years), Nova Scotian KTRs affiliated with the Atlantic Canada Multi-Organ Transplant Program.

Ambulance-ED events were captured for all transplant recipients (following the day of discharge from their initial transplant admission) using electronic records (provided by Emergency Health Services, the sole provider of emergency medical services for Nova Scotia). Ambulance-ED was defined as ambulance transport to the ED following a 911 call; interfacility transfers were excluded. Predictors of ambulance-ED included recipient, donor, immunological, and perioperative characteristics (pertaining to the initial admission for kidney transplantation). Outcomes included graft failure and mortality.

Predictors of ambulance-ED were analyzed using a multivariable negative binomial regression model and reported using incidence rate ratios (IRRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The risk of death/graft failure for those with an ambulance-ED within 30 days of hospital discharge following transplantation was analyzed using an adjusted Cox survival analysis and reported using hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs.

A total of 418 patients received a transplant during the study period. A total of 179 (42.8%) experienced one or more ambulance-ED events. Female sex (IRR = 1.60; 95% CI = 1.12-2.29), kidney failure secondary to diabetes (IRR = 2.52; 95% CI = 1.19-5.31), and donor age ≥45 (IRR = 1.50; 95% CI = 1.04-2.15) were all associated with ambulance-ED. There was no significant increase in the risk of death/graft failure for those that experienced ambulance-ED within 30 days of hospital discharge following transplantation (HR = 1.31; 95% CI = 0.44-3.94).

A limitation of this study was that ambulance-ED is not a perfect surrogate marker of acute care needs in a population. Important determinants of health such as living situation and socioeconomic status were not available in this data set.

This study highlights the burden of ambulance use for KTRs and provides insight into the need for more optimal follow-up in certain patient subgroups who are at particularly high risk.