# Nurses’ perception of talent management scale (NPTMS): development, validation and psychometric properties

**Authors:** Duygu Gül, Betül Sönmez

PMC · DOI: 10.1186/s12912-025-02882-8 · BMC Nursing · 2025-04-03

## TL;DR

This paper introduces a new scale to measure nurses' perceptions of talent management, validated for reliability and effectiveness in nursing settings.

## Contribution

The novel Nurses’ Perception of Talent Management Scale (NPTMS) is developed and validated as a reliable and psychometrically sound tool for nursing talent evaluation.

## Key findings

- The NPTMS consists of 26 items and a single factor explaining 63.2% of the variance.
- The scale demonstrated strong validity (RMSEA = 0.078, CFI = 0.924) and high reliability (Cronbach’s α = 0.976).
- It showed good concurrent and convergent validity with AVE > 0.5 and CR > 0.8.

## Abstract

There is an increasing need for a new and comprehensive approach to evaluate nursing talent to increase effectiveness and productivity. Talent management, which plays an important role in identifying, developing and retaining nursing talent, is a key strategy for investing in nursing. This study aimed to develop the Nurses’ Perception of Talent Management Scale (NPTMS) and assess its psychometric properties.

The scale was developed using a methodological design with a convenience sampling method including 918 nurses (nEFA=422, nCFA=496) from 12 hospitals in Istanbul between September and April 2022. The scale was developed in three phases. Firstly, items reflecting talent management in nursing were created through a comprehensive literature review employing the deductive method. Then, the face and content validity of the scale were evaluated. Finally, construct validity (exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, concurrent validity, convergent and divergent validity) and reliability (item-total score correlation, split-half method, Cronbach’s α coefficient, equivalent forms reliability and test-retest) were evaluated for psychometric properties.

The newly developed scale, for which validity and reliability analyses were conducted using two separate samples through exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, was found to consist of 26 items and a single factor. This factor explained 63.2% of the variance related to the structure and showed acceptable goodness of fit (χ2/sd = 4.325, RMSEA = 0.078, RMR = 0.046, TLI = 0.915, CFI = 0.924, NFI = 0.903, GFI = 0.882, IFI = 0.924). The content validity of the scale was found to be 0.95. Construct validity results indicated that the scale exhibited strong concurrent validity (rEFA =0.755, rCFA =0.772, p < 0.05) and convergent and divergent validity (AVE > 0.5; CR > 0.8; CR > AVE). The reliability analyses revealed high internal consistency (0.976EFA;0.978CFA), time invariance (ICC = 0.836), and equivalent forms reliability (p < 0.05).

The scale is a valid and reliable tool for assessing nurses’ perceptions of talent management. It can be used to evaluate talent management practices in nursing and developing policies and strategies that support investment in nursing talent.

Not applicable.

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12912-025-02882-8.

## Full-text entities

- **Genes:** CFI (complement factor I) [NCBI Gene 3426] {aka AHUS3, ARMD13, C3BINA, C3b-INA, FI, IF}, NFIC (nuclear factor I C) [NCBI Gene 4782] {aka CTF, CTF5, NF-I, NF-I/C, NF1-C, NFI}
- **Diseases:** COVID-19 (MESH:D000086382), NPTMS (MESH:C538175)
- **Chemicals:** EFA (-)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11966793/full.md

## Figures

2 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11966793/full.md

## References

7 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11966793/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11966793