Genome characteristics of cluster EA Microbacterium bacteriophages HungryHenry, CaptainRex, and ChikPic isolated from soil in Tennessee
Sergei Markov, Clayton Barnes, Ariel Hensley, Nicholas More

TL;DR
This paper describes three new bacteriophages found in Tennessee soil and their genome features.
Contribution
The study isolates and characterizes three novel Microbacterium bacteriophages in cluster EA.
Findings
The phages have genome lengths of 41,516 bp, 39,941 bp, and 40,333 bp.
They encode 62, 61, and 63 putative genes, respectively.
All three phages belong to actinobacteriophage cluster EA with distinct subclusters.
Abstract
Bacteriophages HungryHenry, CaptainRex, and ChikPic were isolated from soil collected in Tennessee using the bacterium Microbacterium foliorum . These bacteriophages have genomes that are 41,516 bp, 39,941 bp, and 40,333 bp in length and encode 62, 61, and 63 putative genes, respectively. Based on gene content similarity, all three bacteriophages are assigned to actinobacteriophage cluster EA (subclusters EA1, EA2 and EA5, respectively).
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsBacteriophages and microbial interactions · Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies · Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
Description
To expand our understanding of actinobacteriophage diversity and evolution, we described the isolation and characterization of three bacteriophages using Microbacterium foliorum ( M. foliorum ) NRRL B-24224 (Jacobs-Sera et al., 2020; Hatfull, 2020; Markov et al., 2022; Russell et al., 2019).
Bacteriophages HungryHenry, CaptainRex, and ChikPic were isolated from soil collected in Tennessee using standard methods (Zorawik et al., 2024). Collection site GPS coordinates and ambient temperatures are provided in Table 1. Briefly, soil samples were incubated for 2 hours in PYCa (peptone yeast calcium) liquid medium. The suspensions were then filtered (0.22-µm pores), and the resulting filtrates were inoculated with M. foliorum and incubated with shaking (250 rpm) at 30°C for 2 days. An aliquot for each culture was then filtered and plated with PYCa top agar overlays containing M. foliorum . Following incubation at 30°C for 48 hours, representative plaques were selected for each sample and bacteriophages were purified through two additional rounds of plating. Bacteriophages for all three samples formed turbid plaques.
DNA was isolated from bacteriophage lysates using the Wizard DNA Clean-Up Kit (Promega, Madison, WI) and enzymatically sheared for sequencing using the Ultra II Library Kit (NEB, Ipswich, MA). An Illumina MiSeq instrument (v3 reagents) was used for DNA sequencing to yield 150-base single-end reads that were assembled using Newbler v2.9 (Russell, 2018) and checked for genomic termini and completeness using Consed v29, as previously described (Russell, 2018). Sequencing results and genome characteristics are provided in Table 1.
Bacteriophage genome annotation was conducted using DNA Master v5.23 (Pope et al., 2018), Glimmer v3.02 (Delcher et al., 1999), GeneMark v2.5p (Besemer and Borodovsky 2005), Aragorn v1.2.41 (Laslett et al., 2004), Phamerator v393.0 (Cresawn et al., 2011), PECAAN v20211202.0 (https://blog.kbrinsgd.org/), BLASTp (Altschul et al., 1990) against the NCBI non-redundant and Actinobacteriophage databases, tRNAscan-SE v2.0 (Lowe, 2016), HHpred v3.2 (Söding et al., 2005) against the PDB_mmCIF70, Pfam v.37.0, and NCBI Conserved Domains databases v3.19. Genes start locations were established using Starterator v485.0 (http://phages.wustl.edu/starterator). Except where otherwise noted, default parameters were used. The number of genes predicted along with putative functional assignments are presented in Table 1. Using the gene content similarity of at least 35% to bacteriophages in the Actinobacteriophage database, HungryHenry, CaptainRex, and ChikPic were all assigned to actinobacteriophage cluster EA, subclusters EA1, EA5, and EA2, respectively (Pope, 2017; Gauthier and Hatfull 2023). When compared to other EA bacteriophages described by Jacobs-Sera et al. (Jacobs-Sera et al., 2020) and in phagesdb.org (https://phagesdb.org/), CaptainRex (jointly with bacteriophage Librie) was found to have the shortest genome of EA5 subcluster. CaptainRex also had the lowest GC content of EA5 bacteriophages, and ChikPic was found to be one of two EA2 bacteriophages without an identifiable tRNA. Transmission electron micrographs for previously characterized cluster EA bacteriophages suggests that all three the bacteriophages are likely to have siphoviral morphologies (Jacobs-Sera et al., 2020).
Data availability
GenBank accession numbers for HungryHenry, CaptainRex, and ChikPic are PP978832 , OQ938588, and OR553911 respectively. SRA accession numbers are SRX26311144 , SRX14443488 , and SRX26311141 respectively.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1Altschul Stephen F. Gish Warren Miller Webb Myers Eugene W. Lipman David J. 1990101 Basic local alignment search tool Journal of Molecular Biology 21530022-283640341010.1016/s 0022-2836(05)80360-22231712 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 2Besemer J. Borodovsky M. 200571 Gene Mark: web software for gene finding in prokaryotes, eukaryotes and viruses Nucleic Acids Research 33Web Server 0305-1048 W 451W 45410.1093/nar/gki 48715980510 PMC 1160247 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 3Cresawn Steven G Bogel Matt Day Nathan Jacobs-Sera Deborah Hendrix Roger W Hatfull Graham F 20111012 Phamerator: a bioinformatic tool for comparative bacteriophage genomics BMC Bioinformatics 1211471-210510.1186/1471-2105-12-395PMC 323361221991981 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 4Delcher A. 1999121 Improved microbial gene identification with GLIMMER Nucleic Acids Research 27231362-49624636464110.1093/nar/27.23.463610556321 PMC 148753 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 5Gauthier Christian H. Hatfull Graham F. 20231026 Pham Clust: a phage genome clustering tool using proteomic equivalencem Systems 852379-507710.1128/msystems.00443-23PMC 1065410337791778 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 6Gordon David Abajian Chris Green Phil 199831 Consed: A Graphical Tool for Sequence Finishing Genome Research 831088-905119520210.1101/gr.8.3.1959521923 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 7Hatfull Graham F. 2020929 Actinobacteriophages: Genomics, Dynamics, and Applications Annual Review of Virology 712327-056X 376110.1146/annurev-virology-122019-070009 PMC 801033232991269 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 8Jacobs-Sera Deborah Abad Lawrence A. Alvey Richard M. Anders Kirk R. Aull Haley G. Bhalla Suparna S. Blumer Lawrence S. Bollivar David W. Bonilla J. Alfred Butela Kristen A. Coomans Roy J. Cresawn Steven G. D'Elia Tom Diaz Arturo Divens Ashley M. Edgington Nicholas P. Frederick Gregory D. Gainey Maria D. Garlena Rebecca A. Grant Kenneth W. Gurney Susan M. R. Hendrickson Heather L. Hughes Lee E. Kenna Margaret A. Klyczek Karen K. Kotturi Hari Mavrich Travis N. Mc Kinney Angela L. Merkhofer Evan C. Moberg Parker Jordan Molloy Sa · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
