Evaluation of owners’ and veterinarians’ attitudes toward veterinarian dressing styles in a teaching hospital in Taiwan
Kendy Tzu-yun Teng, You-Jing Shiu, Shang-Lin Wang
TL;DR
This study explores how pet owners and veterinarians in Taiwan perceive different veterinarian dressing styles and appearance traits.
Contribution
The study provides new insights into pet owner and veterinarian preferences for professional appearance in veterinary medicine.
Findings
Pet owners preferred white coats or surgical scrubs as appropriate dressing styles for veterinarians.
Female veterinarians could wear any hairstyle except bald, while male veterinarians were expected to have short hairstyles.
Accessories like glasses or name tags were seen as appropriate, but earrings or tattoos were considered inappropriate by some owners.
Abstract
This study examined preferences for veterinarian dressing styles from both pet owners’ and veterinarians’ perspectives. A questionnaire was distributed to investigate the attitudes of pet owners and veterinarians toward six different dressing styles, four hairstyles, and nine appearance-related subjects toward both male and female veterinarians. A total of 211 pet owners and 92 veterinarians were included. Our results indicated that veterinarian dressing style affected the first impression of pet owners. Pet owners considered wearing a white coat or surgical scrubs an appropriate dressing style for veterinarians. While owners had no sex preference for veterinarians (p < 0.001), they had different attitudes towards various hairstyle for female and male veterinarians. Although any hairstyle, except for a bald hairstyle, was regarded as appropriate for female veterinarians among owners,…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5- —National Taiwan University
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsVeterinary Practice and Education Studies · Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies · Human-Animal Interaction Studies
Introduction
In human medicine, the first impression is important for establishing a positive or negative relationship between the doctor and the patient^1^. Although dressing styles do not directly reflect the expertise and experience of doctors, human research indicates that it may influence the perceptions of the patients on doctors^2^. In general, patients prefer their doctors to be formally dressed because it makes them look more reliable, confident, and earnest^3,4^.
Compared with human medicine, only a few studies have investigated the relationship between veterinarian dressing styles and owner perceptions in veterinary medicine^3–8^. Most pet owners in an emergency setting had no preference regarding the dressing styles of veterinarians^5^. Similarly, another study that revealed that most owners considered it unnecessary for veterinarians to wear a white coat. In addition, wearing blue jeans, having colored hair, or having visible tattoos were not considered inappropriate for veterinarians^6^. However, two studies have revealed that dressing styles may influence owners’ trust in, confidence in, and comfort with a veterinarian^7,8^.
How pet owners and veterinarians regard appropriate dressing styles, hairstyle, and other exterior accessories for veterinarians could be different. In both human and veterinary medicine, the importance of tangibles, referring to physical facilities, appearance of personnel and equipment was shown likely to be overrated by the professionals, compared to the clients^9,10^. Also, one study conducted in the United Kingdom identified key attributes considered important in evaluating whether a veterinarian is perceived as “a good vet^11^”. Notably, a higher proportion of small animal veterinarians, compared to clients, regarded professional appearance as playing a significant role in defining a good veterinarian (p = 0.018). However, a subset of clients considered professional appearance “very important”, which represented a significantly higher proportion than that of small animal veterinarians (p = 0.019). No study that discerned the difference in the preference for attires between pet owners and veterinarians was found in the literature.
The aforementioned studies in veterinary medicine were all conducted in Western countries, and because of cultural differences, different results may be obtained in Asian countries. Thus, this study examined preferences for veterinarian dressing styles, hairstyles, and appearance-related subjects from both owner and veterinarian perspectives in Taiwan. Differences between male and female veterinarians were also analyzed.
Results
Respondents
A total of 303 responses were received (Table 1). Among the respondents, 211 (69.6%) and 92 (30.4%) were pet owners and veterinarians, respectively. About one-third of the respondents were females (n = 203; 67.0%). Compared with the age distribution of veterinarians, among which nearly 90% belonged to the group aged 21–30 years, pet owners were relatively equally distributed among age groups. Approximately two-thirds and one-third of pet owners went to the hospital to request a consultation for their dogs (n = 143; 67.8%) and cats (n = 62; 29.4%), respectively. Six owners (2.8%) preferred to visit female veterinarians, six (2.8%) preferred male veterinarians, and 199 (94.3%) did not have a sex preference. Owners had no sex preference for veterinarians (p < 0.001).
Table 1. Demographics of the respondents of a questionnaire asking the attitudes towards various dressing styles, hairstyles, and accessories of attending veterinarians from a teaching hospital in Taiwan.ItemCategoryAll respondentsOwnersVeterinariansRolePet owner211 (69.6%)Veterinarian92 (30.4%)GenderFemale203 (67.0%)145 (68.7%)58 (63.0%)Male100 (33.0%)66 (31.3%)34 (37.0%)Age group20 years or less5 (1.7%)5 (2.4%)0 (0%)21–30 years135 (44.6%)53 (25.1%)82 (89.1%)31–40 years69 (22.8%)62 (29.4%)7 (7.6%)41–50 years45 (14.9%)42 (19.9%)3 (3.3%)51–60 years25 (8.3%)25 (11.8%)0 (0%)61 years or more24 (7.9%)24 (11.4%)0 (0%)Preferred sex of veterinariansNo preference199 (94.3%)Female6 (2.8%)Male6 (2.8%)
Dressing styles
According to the participants, the appropriateness of the six dressing styles increased from dressing style 1 to 6 (Fig. 1). Regardless of the respondents’ sex, dressing style 1 received much more negative responses than the rest of the styles. Female and male attending veterinarians in dressing style 1 were considered “strongly inappropriate” by 10.6% (n = 32) and 11.5% (n = 35) of the respondents, respectively, and “inappropriate” by 27.1% (n = 82) and 28.7% (n = 87) of the respondents, respectively. In contrast, most participants considered dressing styles 2–6 appropriate or neutral for veterinarians of both sexes, with only 2.6% (n = 8) to 10.2% (n = 31) of them considering these styles as either “strongly inappropriate” or “inappropriate.” Female and male attending veterinarians in dressing style 6 was considered the most appropriate among the participants.
Fig. 1. Responses to questions about the attitude toward different dressing style on female and male attending veterinarians, divided by respondent groups. Ofv: pet owners towards the question with female attending veterinarians in the dress; Omv: pet owners towards the question with male attending veterinarians in the dress; Vfv: veterinarians towards the question with female attending veterinarians in the dress; Vmv: veterinarians towards the question with male attending veterinarians in the dress.
The perception of the appropriateness of different dressing styles of attending veterinarians significantly differed between pet owners and veterinarians (Table 2). The difference was also observed for different dressing styles of attending veterinarians of different sexes in all styles except for the first one (p = 0.323). Generally, veterinarians appeared stricter on the inappropriateness of the dress code than pet owners (Fig. 1).
Table 2. The results for the comparison of the responses towards attending veterinarians and attending veterinarians of different sexes between pet owners and veterinarians from a teaching veterinary hospital in Taiwan.QuestionAdjusted P value for the comparison of the responses towards attending veterinarians between pet owners and veterinariansAdjusted P value for the comparison of the responses towards attending veterinarians of different sexes between pet owners and veterinariansDressing style 10.0250.323Dressing style 2< 0.0010.010Dressing style 3< 0.001< 0.001Dressing style 4< 0.0010.005Dressing style 5< 0.0010.005Dressing style 6< 0.0010.003Long hair0.331< 0.001Medium hair0.3310.006Short hair1.0000.926Bald0.2830.003Earring< 0.001< 0.001Glasses0.3310.846Name tag1.0001.000Necklace0.0110.001Ring0.0950.822Sneaker< 0.001< 0.001Stethoscope0.0280.323Tattoo0.0250.192Watch1.0001.000
Hairstyles
Most participants felt neutral or appropriate toward any hairstyle for female attending veterinarians, except for being bald, with about one-fifth (n = 59; 19.5%) of the participants considering it (strongly) inappropriate (Fig. 2). However, bald, long, and medium hairstyles were considered less appropriate by some participants for male attending veterinarians (7.6%, 16.1%, and 6.2%, respectively).
Fig. 2. Responses to questions about the attitude toward different hairstyles of female and male attending veterinarians, divided by respondent groups. Ofv: pet owners towards the question for female attending veterinarians with the hairstyle; Omv: pet owners towards the question for male attending veterinarians with the hairstyle; Vfv: veterinarians towards the question for female attending veterinarians with the hairstyle; Vmv: veterinarians towards the question for male attending veterinarians with the hairstyle.
Regarding hairstyles, pet owners showed significantly stronger negative attitudes toward male attending veterinarians with long (p < 0.001) or medium (p = 0.006) hairstyles and bald female attending veterinarians than participating veterinarian (p = 0.003; Fig. 2; Table 2).
Accessories
The presence of a name tag (66.3% for female and 73.3% for male attending veterinarians) and a stethoscope (58.7% for female and 57.4% for male attending veterinarians) on veterinarians was considered (strongly) appropriate. Approximately one-fifth to one-fourth of the participants regarded wearing a ring and having tattoos as (strongly) inappropriate for attending veterinarians of both sexes. According to the participants, wearing earrings or necklaces was more than twice as unacceptable for male attending veterinarians than for female attending veterinarians. Few respondents considered wearing sneakers inappropriate for male and female attending veterinarians (6% and 4.6%). Almost no respondents thought wearing glasses, a name tag, a stethoscope, or a watch inappropriate (Fig. 3).
Fig. 3. Responses to questions about the attitude toward the different accessories on female and male attending veterinarians, divided by respondent groups. OF: pet owners towards the question for female attending veterinarians with the accessory; Omv: pet owners towards the question for male attending veterinarians with the accessory; Vfv: veterinarians towards the question for female attending veterinarians with the accessory; Vmv: veterinarians towards the question for male attending veterinarians with the accessory.
The appropriateness of wearing earrings (p < 0.001), a necklace (p = 0.011), and sneakers (p < 0.001) considered by pet owners and veterinarians was significantly different (Fig. 3; Table 2). Generally, veterinarians are stricter on the inappropriateness of the accessories than pet owners. Both veterinary and pet owner respondents strongly disapproved male attending veterinarians wearing earrings (p = < 0.001) or a necklace (p = 0.001), whereas only veterinary respondents appeared to disapprove more male attending veterinarians wearing sneakers (p < 0.001). The responses toward “stethoscope” (p = 0.028) and “tattoo” (p = 0.025) were significant between pet owners and veterinarians. Compared with pet owners, veterinarian respondents considered having tattoos more inappropriate and wearing a stethoscope more appropriate. However, the differences of attitudes were irrelevant to the sex of attending veterinarians.
Perceptions of respondents of different sexes and age groups
When comparing perceptions of dressing styles, hairstyles, and accessories of attending veterinarians between male and female respondents, there was only one significant difference identified (Table 3). Male respondents expressed more disapproval than female respondents for dressing style 6 (scrub shirt + scrub trousers + coat; p = 0.012). Respondents of age 30 or less tended to express the preference of dressing styles and chose less “neutral” than those aging over 30 (Table 4). Additionally, respondents with age over 30 showed more disapproval towards bold hairstyle towards females (p = 0.047) and long (p = 0.002) and medium (p = 0.007) hairstyles towards males.
Table 3. Comparison of perceptions towards various dressing styles, hairstyles, and accessories of attending veterinarians between female and male respondents (i.e., pet owners and veterinarians) from a teaching hospital in Taiwan.CategorySex of respondentsInappropriateNeutralAppropriateFisher’s exact testDressing style 1Female151 (37.2%)182 (44.8%)73 (18.0%)0.459Male85 (42.5%)83 (41.5%)32 (16.0%)Dressing style 2Female33 (8.1%)171 (42.1%)202 (49.8%)0.607Male18 (9.0%)91 (45.5%)91 (45.5%)Dressing style 3Female34 (8.4%)152 (37.4%)220 (54.2%)0.543Male22 (11.0%)71 (35.5%)107 (53.5%)Dressing style 4Female22 (5.4%)149 (36.7%)235 (57.9%)0.270Male16 (80.0%)63 (31.5%)121 (60.5%)Dressing style 5Female14 (3.5%)104 (25.6%)288 (71.0%)0.132Male13 (6.5%)58 (29.0%)129 (64.5%)Dressing style 6Female7 (1.7%)83 (20.4%)316 (77.8%)0.012Male10 (5.0%)53 (26.5%)137 (68.5%)BaldFemale47 (11.6%)247 (60.8%)112 (27.6%)0.700Male35 (17.5%)112 (56.0%)53 (26.5%)Long hairFemale37 (9.1%)225 (55.4%)144 (35.5%)0.606Male18 (9.0%)118 (59.0%)64 (32.0%)Medium hairFemale12 (3.0%)224 (55.2%)170 (41.9%)0.211Male9 (4.5%)108 (54.0%)83 (41.5%)Short hairFemale2 (0.5%)212 (52.2%)192 (47.3%)0.139Male1 (0.5%)118 (59.0%)81 (40.5%)EaringFemale60 (14.8%)288 (70.9%)58 (14.3%)0.788Male34 (17.0%)139 (69.5%)27 (13.5%)GlassesFemale1 (0.3%)300 (73.9%)105 (25.9%)0.749Male0 (0.0%)144 (72.0%)56 (28.0%)Name tagFemale6 (1.5%)116 (28.6%)284 (70.0%)0.763Male2 (1.0%)62 (31.0%)136 (68.0%)NecklaceFemale62 (15.3%)280 (69.0%)64 (15.8%)0.865Male30 (15.0%)135 (67.5%)35 (17.5%)RingFemale96 (23.7%)243 (59.9%)67 (16.5%)0.286Male41 (20.5%)133 (66.5%)26 (13.0%)SneakerFemale18 (4.4%)291 (71.7%)97 (23.9%)0.332Male14 (7.0%)144 (72.0%)42 (21.0%)StethoscopeFemale1 (0.3%)171 (42.1%)234 (57.6%)0.785Male1 (0.5%)81 (40.5%)118 (59.0%)TattooFemale90 (22.2%)263 (64.8%)53 (13.1%)0.636Male50 (25.0%)128 (64.0%)22 (11.0%)WatchFemale9 (2.2%)259 (63.8%)138 (34.0%)0.343Male8 (4.0%)131 (65.5%)61 (30.5%)
Table 4. Comparison of perceptions towards various dressing styles, hairstyles, and accessories of attending veterinarians between respondents of different age groups from a teaching hospital in Taiwan.CategorySex of respondentsInappropriateNeutralAppropriateFisher’s exact testDressing style 1Age 30 and less117 (41.8%)109 (38.9%)54 (19.3%)0.082Over age 30119 (36.5%)156 (47.9%)51 (15.6%)Dressing style 2Age 30 and less23 (8.2%)99 (35.4%)158 (56.4%)0.001Over age 3028 (8.6%)163 (50.0%)135 (41.4%)Dressing style 3Age 30 and less38 (13.6%)70 (25.0%)172 (61.4%)> 0.001Over age 3018 (5.5%)153 (46.9%)155 (47.5%)Dressing style 4Age 30 and less25 (8.9%)76 (27.1%)179 (63.9%)> 0.001Over age 3013 (4.0%)136 (41.7%)177 (54.3%)Dressing style 5Age 30 and less19 (6.8%)49 (17.5%)212 (75.7%)> 0.001Over age 308 (2.5%)113 (34.7%)205 (62.9%)Dressing style 6Age 30 and less15 (5.4%)53 (18.9%)212 (75.7%)> 0.001Over age 302 (0.6%)83 (25.5%)241 (73.9%)BaldAge 30 and less26 (9.3%)175 (62.5%)79 (28.2%)> 0.001Over age 3056 (17.2%)184 (56.4%)86 (26.4%)Long hairAge 30 and less12 (4.3%)171 (61.1%)97 (34.6%)0.002Over age 3043 (13.2%)172 (52.8%)111 (34.0%)Medium hairAge 30 and less3 (1.1%)167 (59.6%)110 (39.3%)0.453Over age 3018 (5.5%)165 (50.6%)143 (43.9%)Short hairAge 30 and less1 (0.4%)160 (57.1%)119 (42.5%)0.017Over age 302 (0.6%)170 (52.1%)154 (47.2%)EaringAge 30 and less53 (18.9%)195 (69.6%)32 (11.4%)0.040Over age 3041 (12.6%)232 (71.2%)53 (16.3%)GlassesAge 30 and less0 (0.0%)218 (77.9%)62 (22.1%)0.024Over age 301 (0.3%)226 (69.3%)99 (30.4%)Name tagAge 30 and less1 (0.4%)89 (31.8%)190 (67.9%)0.088Over age 307 (2.1%)89 (27.3%)230 (70.6%)NecklaceAge 30 and less46 (16.4%)194 (69.3%)40 (14.3%)0.385Over age 3046 (14.1%)221 (67.8%)59 (18.1%)RingAge 30 and less71 (25.4%)172 (61.4%)37 (13.2%)0.195Over age 3066 (20.2%)204 (62.6%)56 (17.2%)SneakerAge 30 and less18 (6.4%)214 (76.4%)48 (17.1%)0.005Over age 3014 (4.3%)221 (67.8%)91 (27.9%)StethoscopeAge 30 and less2 (0.7%)107 (38.2%)171 (61.1%)0.086Over age 300 (0.0%)145 (44.5%)181 (55.5%)TattooAge 30 and less55 (19.6%)192 (68.6%)33 (11.8%)0.128Over age 3085 (26.1%)199 (61.0%)42 (12.9%)WatchAge 30 and less5 (1.8%)183 (65.4%)92 (32.9%)0.397Over age 3012 (3.7%)207 (63.5%)107 (32.8%)
Discussion
Veterinarian dressing styles may play an important role in the first impression of pet owners^1^, and the current study identified important gaps in the perception of dressing styles between pet owners and veterinarians in Taiwan. Different dressing styles, hairstyles, and accessories for male and female veterinarians were perceived with varying degrees of appropriateness. Veterinary practitioners can mind our attire according to the results of the current study to form a more reliable relationship between owners and veterinarians.
A previous study in veterinary medicine indicated that owners feel greater trust in and comfort with female veterinarians than male veterinarians^7^. Owners were also more likely to share medical and social information regarding their pet to a female veterinarian^12^. In addition, human patients appear less intimidated by female doctors and expect female doctors to be more interested in their emotions^13^. However, no sex preference for the veterinarian was found in the current study.
Most of our respondents considered “shirt + trousers” and “scrub shirt + scrub trousers + coat” the most inappropriate and appropriate dressing styles for veterinarians, respectively. Our results were similar to those of studies in veterinary medicine. Coe et al. concluded that the most preferred dressing style is wearing a surgical scrub, followed by white coat, whereas wearing casual shirt and jeans is the most disliked dressing style^7^. Bentley et al. stated that owners perceived veterinarians wearing white coats and surgical scrubs over casual business attire as more competent and have higher comfort levels^8^. According to Sugerman-McGriffin et al., surgical and clinical dressing styles were more preferred by owners over business and casual dressing styles^5^. Robb et al. reported that 70% of owners thought that veterinarians did not have to wear white coats; however, most respondents still preferred veterinarians wearing a white coat^6^. Therefore, if veterinary practitioners want to leave a positive first impression on the owners, wearing either a white coat or surgical scrubs is appropriate for veterinarians in both Western and Eastern countries.
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to explore pet owners’ perceptions of veterinarians’ hairstyles. For female attending veterinarians, almost all hairstyles were considered appropriate or neutral, except that about one-fifth of owners found a bald hairstyle inappropriate. Traditional Asian beauty standards often emphasize long, flowing hair as a symbol of femininity^14^. This may explain the negative perceptions of baldness in women, as it deviates from the cultural norm. Similarly, while 99.6% of the owners regarded short hair being neutral or appropriate, 17.9% of the owners considered long hairstyles inappropriate. These findings are consistent with studies from the United States^15^ and Korea^16^. These studies found that short hairstyles are linked to professionalism. In contrast, long hairstyles may negatively impact perceptions of competence and leadership potential, affecting career opportunities. Generation was also found to be a factor associated with the perceptions towards hairstyles, as older generation seems to associate professionalism with traditional and conservative appearances more, including hairstyles^17^. In the current study, respondents over the age of 30 expressed greater disapproval of non-culturally and sexually conforming hairstyles compared to younger respondents. In general, pet owners seemed less comfortable with diverse hairstyles than veterinarian respondents. Veterinarians can use these findings to inform their hairstyle choices. However, promoting diversity, equity, and inclusion at the facility level may help challenge false associations between hairstyles and competence.
Wearing accessories such as earrings, necklaces, rings, or tattoos was generally perceived as inappropriate, with male attending veterinarians receiving higher rates of disapproval compared to female attending veterinarians. Interestingly, veterinarians were more critical of these accessories than pet owners. These findings suggest that such accessories are not viewed as enhancing the professional image of veterinarians. On the contrary, wearing glasses, a name tag, a stethoscope, or a watch was almost without negative impressions from the results of both owners and veterinarians. An interesting finding in the results of wearing sneakers was noted: 15.2% and 9.8% of the veterinarians think that wearing sneakers was inappropriate for male and female attending veterinarians, respectively; however, only 1.9% and 2.4% of the owners think it was inappropriate. Therefore, wearing sneakers would not negatively affect the professional image of attending veterinarians for most clients in Taiwan, and veterinarians may adapt the point-of-view accordingly.
This study has some limitations. First, this study included twice as many female respondents as male respondents. We are not sure if this population can reflect the true opinion of the owners. Second, the results may vary in different settings, such as emergency or specialty settings. This study was conducted in a national teaching hospital; therefore, it may not reflect the true condition in the first-line clinics. Also, some demographics characteristics such as profession, reason for going to the veterinarian, household income, and social status might be relevant to the preference for and the attitude towards the dressing of veterinarians^7,8^. Future study may further investigate. Lastly, the respondents may be concerned about the consequences of giving truthful answers to some sensitive questions, which is called “thread of disclosure”^18^. To prevent this condition, a QR code was provided for owners to answer this questionnaire without recording personal information. We believe that this method can present a more reliable result.
In conclusion, both pet owners and veterinarians showed a preference for veterinarians’ dressing style, and how pet owners regard appropriate veterinarians’ dressing style may influence their first impression of the veterinarian. Wearing a white coat or surgical scrubs is appropriate for veterinarians. Any hairstyle, except for a bald one, was regarded appropriate for female veterinarians, and male veterinarians with short hair can give a more appropriate impression to the owners. Wearing glasses, a name tag, a stethoscope, a watch, and sneakers tends to leave a neutral or appropriate impression on the owners. Wearing an earring, necklace, ring, or tattoo was considered much more inappropriate by some owners and should be avoided, particularly for male veterinarians. Overall, the owners were stricter than the veterinarians regarding different hairstyles but more permissive on appearance-related subjects.
Methods
Study population and design
The study was conducted at the National Taiwan University Veterinary Hospital, and an anonymous questionnaire was posted online using Google Forms. Pet owners visiting the hospital and veterinarians working there were invited to participate in this study. This study was reviewed for ethics evaluation and was approved for clinical research by the Committee of National Taiwan University Veterinary Hospital (No. NTUVH111001). All methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations. All participants received a link to provide consent, completed the questionnaires and provided informed consent.
Questionnaire design and validity
The questionnaire contained three modules. The first module focused on the demographics of the participants, asking for information about their role (i.e., veterinarians or pet owners), sex, age, type of pet, and sex preference for veterinarians. The second and third modules investigated the attitudes of the participants toward different aspects of the appearance of attending veterinarians of each sex, and participants were asked to rate their opinions on the suitability of the dressing style according to a 5-point Likert scale (1 = strongly inappropriate, 2 = inappropriate, 3 = neutral, 4 = appropriate, and 5 = strongly appropriate). In the second module, photos of six clothing styles of both male and female attending veterinarians were included, namely, shirt + trousers, shirt + trousers + coat, scrub shirt + trousers, scrub shirt + trousers + coat, scrub shirt + scrub trousers, and scrub shirt + scrub trousers + coat (Figs. 4 and 5). The third module further asked about whether different hairstyles (bald, short, medium, and long hair hairstyles), carrying a stethoscope, wearing a name tag, wearing glasses, wearing a watch, wearing a ring, wearing an earring, wearing a necklace, having a tattoo, and wearing sneakers were appropriate in both male and female attending veterinarians.
Fig. 4. Photographs of different attires to male veterinarians.
Fig. 5. Photographs of different attires to female veterinarians.
Face validity, which is the degree to which the questionnaire appears to assess the desired qualities, was established through informal discussions with veterinarians and technicians at the National Taiwan University Veterinary Hospital and their feedback^19^. The survey was officially open to the participants after being tested with 10 veterinarians and 10 pet owners and revised according to their suggestions.
Study implementation
From February 1, 2022, to July 31, 2022, the QR code of the online questionnaire was posted in the waiting area of the surgical, internal medicine, and exotic animal sections at the National Taiwan University Veterinary Hospital. Potential participants, including pet owners and veterinarians working at the teaching hospital were encouraged to scan the QR code linked to the questionnaire.
Statistical analysis
Data cleaning and management were conducted using Microsoft Excel 2016 and R version x64 4.2.2 with R packages “midverse” and “rio” in RStudio interface^20^. Descriptive statistics that summarize the collected data were also performed in R with “tidyverse,” “janitor,” “ggpubr,” and “strex.” Fisher’s exact test was conducted in R to examine whether pet owners and veterinarians had different perceptions of each question for attending veterinarians of both sexes combined, as well as whether pet owners and veterinarians had different perceptions toward female and male attending veterinarians for the same question. Fisher’s exact test was also used to compare the perceptions between female and male respondents, as well as participants of ≤ age of 30 and over age of 30. The tests used recategorized outcomes with “strongly inappropriate” and “inappropriate” as “inappropriate,” “neutral” as “neutral,’ and “appropriate” and “strongly appropriate” as “appropriate.” With multiple testing, the P values were adjusted at the false discovery rate^20^. Any p < 0.05 was considered significant.