# Efficacy and Safety of Cell-Assisted Acellular Adipose Matrix Transfer for Volume Retention and Regeneration Compared to Hyaluronic Acid Filler Injection

**Authors:** Xian Jin, Hyokyung Yoo, Vinh Vuong The Tran, Chenggang Yi, Ki Yong Hong, Hak Chang

PMC · DOI: 10.1007/s00266-024-04408-0 · Aesthetic Plastic Surgery · 2024-10-01

## TL;DR

This study compares a new cell-assisted fat matrix technique with hyaluronic acid fillers for tissue volume and regeneration, finding the new method to be safe and effective.

## Contribution

The study introduces and evaluates cell-assisted acellular adipose matrix transfer as a novel alternative to hyaluronic acid fillers.

## Key findings

- Cell-assisted AAM transfer showed better adipogenesis and collagen formation than hyaluronic acid fillers.
- CAT demonstrated superior angiogenesis and gene expression, with improved biocompatibility.
- CAT maintained similar volume to HA fillers while showing enhanced tissue regeneration.

## Abstract

Cell-assisted acellular adipose matrix (AAM) transfer is a novel technique for soft tissue volume restoration, where AAM acts as a scaffold for tissue proliferation and promotes host cell migration, vascularization, and adipogenesis. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of in vivo cell-assisted AAM transfer compared to hyaluronic acid (HA) filler injection.

Human adipose tissue was used to manufacture AAM, and murine adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs) were prepared. Nude mice were divided into four groups: AAM transfer (AT), ASC-assisted AAM transfer (CAT), HA filler injection (HI), and ASC-assisted HA filler injection (CHI). Eight weeks post-transfer, in vivo graft volume/weight, histology, and gene expression were analyzed to assess efficacy and safety.

The AAM retained its three-dimensional scaffold structure without cellular components. AT/CAT showed lower volume retention than HA/CHA; however, CAT maintained a similar volume to HA. Histologically, adipogenesis and collagen formation were increased in AT/CAT compared to HA/CHA, with CAT showing the highest levels. CAT also demonstrated superior angiogenesis, adipogenesis, and gene expression (Vegf and Pparg), along with lower Il-6 expression, higher Il-10 expression, and reduced capsule formation, indicating better biocompatibility.

Cell-assisted AAM transfer is a promising technique for volume retention and tissue regeneration, offering a safe and effective alternative to HA filler injections.

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00266-024-04408-0.

## Linked entities

- **Genes:** VEGFA (vascular endothelial growth factor A) [NCBI Gene 7422], PPARG (peroxisome proliferator activated receptor gamma) [NCBI Gene 5468], IL6 (interleukin 6) [NCBI Gene 3569], IL10 (interleukin 10) [NCBI Gene 3586]
- **Species:** Mus musculus (taxon 10090)

## Full-text entities

- **Genes:** Cat (catalase) [NCBI Gene 12359] {aka 2210418N07, Cas-1, Cas1, Cs-1}, Pparg (peroxisome proliferator activated receptor gamma) [NCBI Gene 19016] {aka Nr1c3, PPAR-gamma, PPAR-gamma2, PPARgamma, PPARgamma2}, Il6 (interleukin 6) [NCBI Gene 16193] {aka Il-6}, Vegfa (vascular endothelial growth factor A) [NCBI Gene 22339] {aka L-VEGF, Vegf, Vpf}, CAT (catalase) [NCBI Gene 847], Il10 (interleukin 10) [NCBI Gene 16153] {aka CSIF, If2a, Il-10}
- **Chemicals:** Hyaluronic Acid Filler (-), HA (MESH:D006820)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606], Mus musculus (house mouse, species) [taxon 10090]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11965223/full.md

## Figures

7 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11965223/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11965223