# Effectiveness of Low-Volume Versus High-Volume Ropivacaine for Ultrasound-Guided Maxillary Nerve Block in Double-Jaw Surgery: A Randomized Non-inferiority Trial

**Authors:** Ming-Kai Chen, Le Zhao, Wei Luo, Kai Luo, Jie Lin, Yang Ji

PMC · DOI: 10.1007/s00266-025-04671-9 · Aesthetic Plastic Surgery · 2025-01-16

## TL;DR

This study found that using a lower volume of ropivacaine for a maxillary nerve block in jaw surgery is just as effective as a higher volume for pain relief.

## Contribution

The study demonstrates non-inferiority of low-volume ropivacaine for maxillary nerve blocks in double-jaw surgery.

## Key findings

- Low-volume ropivacaine (2 mL) was non-inferior to high-volume (5 mL) in reducing maxillary pain at 2 hours postoperatively.
- No significant differences in pain scores or most secondary outcomes were observed between the two groups.
- Low-volume ropivacaine was associated with a higher incidence of postoperative nausea between 6–24 hours.

## Abstract

Ultrasound-guided maxillary nerve block (UGMNB) is applied in oral and maxillofacial surgery to improve perioperative analgesia, decrease the risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting, and enhance recovery. However, the optimum volume of ropivacaine used for UGMNB is undetermined. Thus, it was hypothesized that in patients undergoing double-jaw surgery, low- and high-volume ropivacaine reduces perioperative pain with similar efficacy.

Adults undergoing double-jaw surgery were enrolled in a randomized non-inferiority trial to receive a bilateral single-injection UGMNB with 2 mL (low-volume [LV] group) or 5 mL (high-volume [HV] group) of 0.375% ropivacaine on each side. A visual analog scale (VAS) score for maxillary pain at 2 h postoperatively was taken as the primary outcome. VAS score for maxillary and mandibular pain at 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, and 48 h postoperatively, hemodynamic changes intraoperatively, consumption of intraoperative opioids and sedatives, vasoactive medication use, extubation time, postoperative rescue analgesia, time to the first analgesia, postoperative nausea and vomiting and UGMNB-related complications within 48 h post-surgery were assessed as the secondary outcomes.

Sixty-four adults were included. The maxillary pain score in the LV group was not inferior to that in the HV group at 2 h postoperatively, with a non-inferiority margin of 1 (mean difference − 0.1; 95% confidence interval [CI] − 0.6 to 0.8, P = 0.414 for non-inferiority). Maxillary and mandibular pain demonstrated no difference in the measured times between groups. The incidence of postoperative nausea was significantly higher in the LV group than that in the HV group at 6–24 h (12 (37.5%) vs. 5 (15.6%), P = 0.048). Moreover, no differences in intraoperative hemodynamic parameters, medications during anesthesia, time to extubation, rescue analgesia, time to the first analgesia, and postoperative vomiting were observed. Only one patient in the LV group was observed to have maxillary nerve block-related complications.

To conclude, the efficacy of UGMNB with 2 mL of 0.375% ropivacaine has the same efficacy as the 5 mL drug in reducing perioperative pain in patients undergoing double-jaw surgery.

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00266-025-04671-9.

## Linked entities

- **Chemicals:** ropivacaine (PubChem CID 71273)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** Maxillary Nerve Block (MESH:D008441), pain (MESH:D010146), Maxillary and mandibular pain (MESH:D008338), LV (MESH:D018487), postoperative nausea (MESH:D020250)
- **Chemicals:** Ropivacaine (MESH:D000077212), vasoactive medication (-)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11965159/full.md

## Figures

4 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11965159/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11965159