Author Correction: Endocytosis in the axon initial segment maintains neuronal polarity
Kelsie Eichel, Takeshi Uenaka, Vivek Belapurkar, Rui Lu, Shouqiang Cheng, Joseph S. Pak, Caitlin A. Taylor, Thomas C. Südhof, Robert Malenka, Marius Wernig, Engin Özkan, David Perrais, Kang Shen
Abstract
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMicrotubule and mitosis dynamics · Supramolecular Self-Assembly in Materials
Correction to: Nature 10.1038/s41586-022-05074-5 Published online 17 August 2022
In the version of the article initially published, Fig. 3j and Extended Data Fig. 5a contained errors that were generated during figure assembly. In both cases, the initially published accompanying source data file contains the correct data. None of the paper’s interpretations are affected by this correction.
Figure 3j contained an error in the lrpl-1(lof) lrp2(lof) mutant data, which were mistakenly graphed and inadvertently duplicated from the overexpressed DMA-1 condition of Fig. 1p. This error only pertains to the lrpl-1(lof) lrp2(lof) mutant data. Data for wild type and degt-1(lof) were intentionally re-graphed between Fig. 1p and Fig. 3j as specified in the published Fig. 3 legend. The corrected graph is shown below in Fig. 1, together with the incorrect published graph, for transparency to the readers. This error did not affect any conclusions because the source data were correct, and the mistaken bar graph in question was from a mutant phenotype with a very similar defect (76.67% vs 78.33% of animals responding).Fig. 1. Original and corrected Fig. 3j.
Extended Data Fig. 5a contained an incorrect display micrograph for the DMA-1(ΔYFGI) mutant. This error occurred during figure assembly, and the corresponding quantification and raw data for this experiment, which are graphed in Extended Data Fig. 5b, are correct. The corrected figure panel is shown below in Fig. 2, together with the incorrect published display panel, for transparency to the readers. This error did not affect any conclusions because the source data were correct, and the mistaken display panel was from a statistically indistinguishable genotype.Fig. 2. Original and corrected Extended Data Fig. 5a.