# Comparison of pegaspargase with concurrent radiation vs. P-GEMOX with sequential radiation in early-stage NK/T-cell lymphoma

**Authors:** DEMEI FENG, SHENRUI BAI, GUANJUN CHEN, BIBO FU, CAILU SONG, HAILIN TANG, LIANG WANG, HUA WANG

PMC · DOI: 10.32604/or.2024.057065 · Oncology Research · 2025-03-19

## TL;DR

This study compares two treatment regimens for early-stage NKTCL and finds that both are similarly effective, though one offers a shorter treatment cycle.

## Contribution

The study provides a direct comparison of two treatment strategies for NKTCL using propensity score matching to balance patient characteristics.

## Key findings

- P+CCRT achieved 100% overall response rate and 100% complete response rate, compared to 88.5% and 76.9% for P-GEMOX + SERT.
- Both regimens showed similar 3-year overall survival rates (92.3%), but P+CCRT had better progression-free survival (92.3% vs. 80.8%).
- Adverse events were comparable between the two treatment groups.

## Abstract

The optimal treatment strategy for early-stage natural killer/T-cell lymphoma (NKTCL) remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the clinical outcomes and adverse events (AEs) associated with two treatment regimens for early-stage NKTCL: pegaspargase with concurrent radiation therapy (P+CCRT) and pegaspargase, gemcitabine, and oxaliplatin (P-GEMOX) with sequential radiation therapy (SERT). Propensity score matching (PSM) was employed to ensure balanced comparison between these regimens.

We assessed the efficacy of P+CCRT from a phase II trial and P-GEMOX combined with SERT using real-world data. PSM was conducted at a 1:1 ratio with a caliper of 0.18 to align baseline characteristics between the treatment groups. Key outcomes analyzed included overall response rate (ORR), complete response rate (CR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and AEs.

Following PSM, the study included 52 patients, with 26 in each treatment group. Baseline characteristics were balanced between the cohorts. The ORR for P+CCRT group was 100.0% compared to 88.5% for P-GEMOX+ SERT group, and the CR rates was 100.0% vs. 76.9%, respectively. The 3-year OS and PFS rates were both 92.3% for P+CCRT, while P-GEMOX showed 92.3% OS and 80.8% PFS. Adverse events, including hematological toxicity, hepatotoxicity, and coagulation dysfunction, were comparable between the two regimens.

P+CCRT is associated with comparable clinical outcomes compared to P-GEMOX + SERT in early-stage NKTCL, with comparable adverse events. Additionally, P+CCRT offers the benefit of a more streamlined treatment regimen with a shorter cycle. Given these encouraging results, further cohort studies are needed to validate these results.

## Linked entities

- **Chemicals:** gemcitabine (PubChem CID 60750), oxaliplatin (PubChem CID 9887053)
- **Diseases:** NKTCL (MONDO:0019472)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** NK/T-cell lymphoma (MESH:D016399), coagulation dysfunction (MESH:D001778), hematological toxicity (MESH:D006402), NKTCL (MESH:D000077428)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11964867/full.md

## Figures

2 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11964867/full.md

## References

30 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11964867/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11964867