# Commodity risk assessment of Prunus spp. plants from United Kingdom

**Authors:** Antonio Vicent Civera, Paula Baptista, Elisavet Chatzivassiliou, Jaime Cubero, Nik Cunniffe, Eduardo de la Peña, Nicolas Desneux, Anna Filipiak, Paolo Gonthier, Beata Hasiów‐Jaroszewska, Hervé Jactel, Blanca B. Landa, Lara Maistrello, David Makowski, Panagiotis Milonas, Nikos T. Papadopoulos, Roel Potting, Hanna Susi, Dirk Jan van der Gaag, Pedro Gómez, Annemarie Fejer Justesen, Andrea Lucchi, Gregor Urek, Jonathan Yuen, Lucia Zappala, Umberto Bernardo, Giovanni Bubici, Anna Vittoria Carluccio, Michela Chiumenti, Francesco Di Serio, Elena Fanelli, Paraskevi Kariampa, Cristina Marzachì, Agata Kaczmarek, Louise Matic, Olaf Mosbach‐Schulz, Anna Berlin

PMC · DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9306 · EFSA Journal · 2025-04-02

## TL;DR

This paper assesses the risk of importing Prunus plants from the UK to the EU, focusing on potential pests and mitigation measures.

## Contribution

The study provides a detailed risk assessment of specific Prunus plant commodities and evaluates associated pests for importation from the UK.

## Key findings

- E. amylovora is the most frequently expected pest on imported potted Prunus plants.
- Expert judgment indicates a high likelihood of pest freedom with 95% certainty for most plants.

## Abstract

The European Commission requested the EFSA Panel on Plant Health to prepare and deliver risk assessments for commodities listed in Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2019 as ‘High risk plants, plant products and other objects’. This Scientific Opinion covers plant health risks posed by: grafted potted plants up to 15 years old or bundles of grafted bare root plants up to 3 years old or graftwood up to 2 years old of Prunus armeniaca, P. cerasifera, P. domestica, P. incisa or P. persica imported from the United Kingdom (UK), taking into account the available scientific information, including the technical information provided by the UK. All pests associated with the commodities were evaluated against specific criteria for their relevance for this opinion. Two quarantine pests, Candidatus Phytoplasma aurantifolia‐related strains (Pear decline Taiwan II, Crotalaria witches' broom phytoplasma, Sweet potato little leaf phytoplasma) and Scirtothrips dorsalis, two protected zone quarantine pests, Bemisia tabaci (European population) and Erwinia amylovora, and two non‐regulated pests, Eulecanium excrescens and Colletotrichum aenigma, that fulfilled all relevant criteria were selected for further evaluation. The risk mitigation measures proposed in the technical Dossier from the UK were evaluated, taking into account the possible limiting factors. For these pests, expert judgement is given on the likelihood of pest freedom, taking into consideration the risk mitigation measures, including uncertainties associated with the assessment. The degree of pest freedom varied among the pests evaluated, with E. amylovora being the most frequently expected pest on the imported potted plants. The expert knowledge elicitation indicated with 95% certainty that between 9956 and 10,000 potted plants per 10,000 would be free from the above‐mentioned bacterium.

## Linked entities

- **Species:** Prunus armeniaca (taxon 36596)

## Full-text entities

- **Species:** Crotalaria witches'-broom phytoplasma (species) [taxon 452530], Scirtothrips dorsalis (species) [taxon 163899], Prunus armeniaca (apricot, species) [taxon 36596], Bemisia tabaci (sweet potato whitefly, species) [taxon 7038], Candidatus Phytoplasma citri (species) [taxon 180978], Prunus cerasifera (cherry plum, species) [taxon 36595], Prunus persica (peach, species) [taxon 3760], Colletotrichum aenigma (species) [taxon 1215731], Candidatus Phytoplasma australasiaticum subsp. ipomoeae (subspecies) [taxon 101513], Lobosphaera incisa (species) [taxon 312850], Erwinia amylovora (species) [taxon 552]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11962654/full.md

## Figures

12 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11962654/full.md

## References

25 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11962654/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11962654