PROTOCOL: Government‐Led Communication Campaigns for Reducing Violent Extremism − A Systematic Review
Ghayda Hassan, Sébastien Brouillette‐Alarie, Kurt Braddock, Sarah Carthy, Wynnpaul Varela, Pablo Madriaza, Paul Gill
TL;DR
This paper outlines a plan to review evidence on how well government-run communication campaigns prevent violent extremism.
Contribution
The study introduces a systematic review protocol to evaluate the effectiveness of government-led anti-violent extremism communication campaigns.
Findings
The protocol aims to gather and synthesize evidence on government-led communication campaigns.
It will critically appraise the effectiveness of these campaigns in preventing violent extremism.
Abstract
This is the protocol for a Campbell systematic review. The main objective of this project is to gather, critically appraise, and synthesize evidence about the effectiveness of government‐led communication campaigns geared toward preventing violent extremism.
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsTerrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence · Social and Intergroup Psychology · Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression