Real-world data on the efficacy and toxicity of induction chemotherapy in locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma in a non-endemic population
Cassio Murilo Hidalgo Filho, Gabriel Berlingieri Polho, Otavio Augusto Moreira, Matheus de Oliveira Andrade, Vinicius Cruz Parrela, Yumi Ricucci Shinkado, Amanda Acioli de Almeida Robatto, Felippe Lazar Neto, Ana Julia Freitas, Aurelio Teixeira Souza, Gilberto de Castro Junior

TL;DR
This study examines the effectiveness and side effects of induction chemotherapy for advanced nasopharyngeal cancer in a non-endemic population.
Contribution
The study provides real-world data on induction chemotherapy efficacy and toxicity in a non-endemic population for nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
Findings
CR rates were similar across different ICT regimens (68.0% to 50%).
Poor OS was linked to ECOG-PS ≥2 and residual disease.
Stage IV and ECOG-PS ≥2 were associated with residual disease.
Abstract
Induction chemotherapy (ICT) is critical for managing locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LA-NPC), but real-world data on its efficacy and toxicity are limited. This retrospective study included LA-NPC patients treated with ICT from 2012 to 2022. We evaluated radiological response rates, overall survival (OS), treatment-related toxicities and complete response (CR) rates. Among 217 patients, 119 met the inclusion criteria and were included in the final analysis. CR rates were similar across ICT regimens (docetaxel, cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil 68.0%; cisplatin and gemcitabine 57.1%; cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil 58.0%; others 50%, p = 0.72). Serious adverse events (SAEs) occurred in 22%, with 69.7% experiencing weight loss and 31.9% requiring enteral tube placement. Poor OS was linked to Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG-PS) ≥2 hazard ratios (HR 2.8, p…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsHead and Neck Cancer Studies · Oral health in cancer treatment · Lung Cancer Research Studies
