934 Burn-Injured Females More Prone to Chronic Shame Than Male Counterparts and Family Support Matters
Ruth Rimmer, Curt Bay, Emile Kalil, Daniel Chacon, Erika Mendoza, Tess Robaina, Kevin Foster

TL;DR
Burn-injured females experience more chronic shame than males, and strong family support can help reduce this shame.
Contribution
This study identifies gender differences in shame proneness among burn survivors and highlights the role of family support in mitigating shame.
Findings
Females reported significantly higher shame scores on the Shame-NSE scale compared to males.
Participants with moderate family support had significantly lower shame scores.
Shame levels were not influenced by scar visibility or ethnicity.
Abstract
Several psychological disorders, including PTSD, depression and anxiety, have been noted to occur in burn-injured persons commonly. Shame and guilt, distinct constructs, can also follow burn injury. Shame after trauma, a maladaptive response, has been linked to negative outcomes, including suicidality, substance abuse, and identity issues. Burn-injured individuals were invited to complete the Guilt Voluntarily and Shame Proneness Scale (GASP). It measures individual differences in the tendency to experience guilt and shame across a range of personal transgressions. The GASP contains four four-item subscales: Guilt-Negative-Behavior-Evaluation (Guilt-NBE), Guilt-Repair, Shame-Negative-Self-Evaluation (Shame-NSE), and Shame-Withdraw. Participants included burn survivors (n=116), with a mean age of 16.3 years, SD (±3.96), female (n=62), male (n=52), Caucasian (25%), Hispanic (48%), and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsBurn Injury Management and Outcomes
