990 Flap Coverage for Fournier’s Gangrene
Kristine Laing, Alwaleed Alammar, David Wallace, Alan Rogers

TL;DR
This paper reviews the use of flap-based reconstruction for Fournier’s gangrene, showing it offers better outcomes than skin grafts.
Contribution
The first systematic review analyzing flap-based reconstruction techniques for Fournier’s gangrene defects.
Findings
Flap-based reconstruction is a reliable method for managing Fournier’s gangrene defects.
Common flap techniques include anterolateral thigh, medial thigh, and pudendal thigh flaps.
Complication rates were low, with minimal flap losses reported.
Abstract
Fournier’s gangrene (FG) is a life-threatening necrotizing soft tissue infection (NSTI) affecting the perineum and genital region, necessitating urgent debridement and ultimately coverage, often in the burn center context. Skin grafts are often used for reconstruction but may result in suboptimal outcomes. Flap-based reconstructions have shown potential for better functional and aesthetic results, but no systematic review has been undertaken to date. This systematic review was conducted following the PRISMA protocol. A comprehensive search of EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane, Google Scholar, and CINAHL databases was performed. The search terms included “Necrotizing soft tissue infections,” “Gas gangrene,” “Fournier’s gangrene,” “Flap,” and “Graft.” Covidence software facilitated study selection and reference tracking. The inclusion criteria targeted studies on human subjects involving flap…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsStreptococcal Infections and Treatments
