rab-33 is not required for cuticle integrity in Caenorhabditis elegans
Emily Williams, Nico Pinzon, Grace Semrau, Vicky Pete, Mary Elizabeth Gabrielle, Rachid El Bejjani

TL;DR
This study shows that the rab-33 gene is not essential for maintaining the cuticle in the worm Caenorhabditis elegans.
Contribution
The study introduces a novel null allele of rab-33 and demonstrates its non-essential role in cuticle integrity.
Findings
Loss of rab-33 does not lead to cuticle defects in C. elegans.
Rab-33 is not required for glycosylation or axon regeneration in this model organism.
Abstract
Rab GTPases are master regulators of intracellular transport. We previously showed that a rab-6.2 deletion leads to a compromised cuticle, glycosylation defects, and increased axon regeneration. Mammalian orthologs of rab-6.2 and rab-33 have been shown to mediate Golgi trafficking of cargo in mammalian cells, including that of glycosyltransferase enzymes. We engineered a novel STOP-IN putative null allele of rab-33 ( axr2 ) to determine if loss of function of rab-33 phenocopies the phenotypes seen in rab-6.2 ( ok2254 ). Our results suggest that rab-33 is not required for cuticle integrity.
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsContact Dermatitis and Allergies · Nail Diseases and Treatments · Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus
