Performance of the Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Tool for Asians (OSTA) Index for Osteoporosis Screening in Thai Men: A Cross-Sectional Study
Jirapong Leeyaphan, Karn Rojjananukulpong, Piyapong Intarasompun, Yuthasak Peerakul

TL;DR
This study evaluates the OSTA index's effectiveness in predicting osteoporosis in Thai men and finds the KKOS score to be a better screening tool.
Contribution
The study compares the OSTA index with the KKOS score and age cutoff for osteoporosis screening in Thai men, identifying the most effective method.
Findings
The OSTA index cutoff of −1 had higher sensitivity but lower specificity than −4 for predicting osteoporosis.
The KKOS score ≤−1 outperformed the OSTA index ≤−1 in predicting osteoporosis (AUC 0.636 vs. 0.594).
An age cutoff of ≥70 years was less effective than both the OSTA and KKOS methods.
Abstract
Background Addressing the under-recognition of osteoporosis in men necessitates the use of suitable screening tools tailored to the male population. The Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Tool for Asians (OSTA) index is a reliable tool for evaluating the risk of osteoporosis. This cross-sectional study aims to assess the predictive performance of the OSTA index in Thai men. Additionally, the study compares the performance of the OSTA index with the Khon Kaen Osteoporosis Study (KKOS) score and an age cutoff value of ≥70 years. Methods Between November 2017 and October 2024, men aged 50 years or older who underwent dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and did not receive any osteoporosis treatment were included. The performance of the individual OSTA index cutoff values in predicting osteoporosis was assessed. Results A total of 427 men were included in this study and classified into normal…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsBone health and osteoporosis research · Nutrition and Health in Aging · Hip and Femur Fractures
