Comparative Study on the Outcomes of Right Ventricular Outflow Tract Stenting vs. Modified Blalock-Taussig Shunt in Patients with Tetralogy of Fallot: A Prospective Randomized Trial
Aleksey V. Voitov, Meline G. Morsina, Serezha N. Manukian, Ilya A. Soynov, Nataliya R. Nichay, Yury Yu. Kulyabin, Aleksey N. Arkhipov, Manolis G. Pursanov, Artem V. Gorbatykh, Alexander V. Bogachev-Prokophiev

TL;DR
This study compares two surgical treatments for tetralogy of Fallot in infants, finding that stenting leads to better pulmonary artery growth than a shunt.
Contribution
A novel prospective randomized trial comparing right ventricular outflow tract stenting and modified Blalock-Taussig shunt outcomes in Tetralogy of Fallot.
Findings
Stenting led to significantly greater increases in Nakata index compared to shunt placement.
Pulmonary artery growth rates were higher in the stent group for both right and left arteries.
Complete correction procedures were similarly frequent between the two groups.
Abstract
To evaluate pulmonary vascular development and outcomes of complete correction following palliative treatment in infants with critical tetralogy of Fallot. This prospective, randomized, two-center study included infants with tetralogy of Fallot who underwent surgery between June 2018 and 2022. The patients were divided into two groups - those who underwent stenting of the right ventricular outflow tract (stent group, n=21) and those who underwent modified Blalock-Taussig shunt placement (shunt group, n=21). In the stent group, a significantly greater increase in Nakata index was observed, with mean values rising from 104.2 to 208.6 mm2/m2, compared to an increase from 107.3 to 169.4 mm2/m2 in the shunt group (P<0.01). According to the mixed model analysis, the rate of growth of the right pulmonary artery in the stent group was 2.05*10-2 z score/day, which was 3.01 times greater than…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCongenital Heart Disease Studies · Pulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments · Tracheal and airway disorders
