Prevalence and predictors of healthcare use for psychiatric disorders at 9 years after a first episode of psychosis: a Swedish national cohort study
Donna van Deursen, Ellenor Mittendorfer-Rutz, Heidi Taipale, Emma Pettersson, Philip McGuire, Paolo Fusar-Poli, Dan W Joyce, Nikolai Albert, Annette Erlangsen, Meredete Nordentoft, Carsten Hjorthøj, Simon Cervenka, Alexis E Cullen

TL;DR
This study examines long-term healthcare use for psychiatric disorders in individuals who experienced their first episode of psychosis, finding that many received treatment for non-psychotic disorders.
Contribution
The study provides new insights into long-term healthcare patterns and predictors following a first episode of psychosis.
Findings
About 31.7% of individuals were treated for psychotic disorders at 9 years after FEP.
Over half (56%) of individuals received psychiatric healthcare, with a significant portion treated for non-psychotic disorders.
Initial diagnosis of schizophrenia and inpatient treatment at first diagnosis were strong predictors of later healthcare use.
Abstract
Psychotic disorders are known to exhibit heterogeneity with regards to illness course and prognosis, yet few studies have examined long-term healthcare use. To determine the prevalence and predictors of healthcare use for psychiatric disorders at 9 years after the first episode of psychosis (FEP). National registers were used to identify all Swedish residents aged 18–35 years with FEP between 2006 and 2013. The 12-month period-prevalence of secondary healthcare use was determined at each year of the 9-year follow-up, categorised according to main diagnosis (psychotic disorder vs other psychiatric disorder vs none vs censored). Multinomial logistic regression models were used to examine associations between baseline characteristics and healthcare use at 9 years and derive predicted probabilities and 95% CIs for the four outcome groups, for each predictor variable. Among 7733…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSchizophrenia research and treatment · Mental Health Treatment and Access · Mental Health and Psychiatry
