Correction: The impact of tax burden on welfare attitudes: Micro evidence from welfare states
Yinan Guo, Ting Gong
Abstract
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGender, Labor, and Family Dynamics · Taxation and Compliance Studies
There are errors in the Tables 3,4 and 11. In Table 3, the values for “R^2^/ Pseudo R^2^” under columns “(3)” and “(4)” should be corrected to “0.044” and “0.054”, respectively. In Table 4, the values for “N” and “R^2^/ Pseudo R^2^” in columns “(1)”, “(2)”, “(3)”, and “(4)” are incorrect. In Table 11, the values for “N” and “R2/ Pseudo R2” in columns “(1)” and “(2)” are incorrect. Please see the correct Tables 3,4 and 11 here.
In the Benchmark regression subsection of Results, there is an error in the first sentence of the fourth paragraph. The correct sentence is: Regarding the family characteristics factors of the control variables, it was found that family size had a positive and significant effect and the number of children showed a negative and significant effect.
In The mediating effect of perceived fairness subsection of Mechanisms test, there is an error in the first sentence of the fourth paragraph. The correct sentence is: In Table 9, the results show that when perceived fairness and tax burden are used as explanatory variables in Column (1) and Column (2), the effect of tax burden on perceived fairness is positive at the 1% level of significance.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.