# Longitudinal assessment of bone mineral density in prostate cancer patients: comparing metastatic and non-metastatic regions

**Authors:** Takuto Hara, Hanako Nishimoto, Tomoaki Terakawa, Yasuyoshi Okamura, Yukari Bando, Hideto Ueki, Kotaro Suzuki, Yoji Hyodo, Jun Teishima, Koji Chiba, Ryosuke Kuroda, Hideaki Miyake

PMC · DOI: 10.1007/s10147-025-02711-7 · International Journal of Clinical Oncology · 2025-02-07

## TL;DR

This study compares bone density changes in prostate cancer patients with and without bone metastases during androgen deprivation therapy.

## Contribution

It provides new insights into bone mineral density changes at non-metastatic sites in patients with bone metastases.

## Key findings

- BMD changes at non-metastatic sites in patients with bone metastases are similar to those in patients without metastases.
- All groups showed significant reductions in T-scores over time, but no significant interaction was found between group classification and time.

## Abstract

Prostate cancer patients receiving androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) have increased risks of decreased bone mineral density (BMD). However, there are no established guidelines for assessing BMD in patients with bone metastases. The aim of this study was to assess the effects of ADT on bone health by comparing longitudinal changes in BMD between prostate cancer patients with and without bone metastases.

A single-center observational study was conducted from February 2020 to January 2023 at Kobe University Hospital. BMD at the lumbar vertebrae, total hip, and femoral neck was measured at baseline, 6, and 12 months using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Bones were classified into Metastatic Site (with metastases), Non-metastatic Sites (from patients with bone metastases), and Control (patients without metastases) groups. All patients received luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone antagonists or agonists plus oral ARSI or bicalutamide for 1 year.

Among the 78 patients, 35, 110, and 245 bones were classified into the Metastatic Site group, Non-metastatic Sites group, and Control group, respectively. The Metastatic Site group exhibited significantly higher T-scores compared with the other groups (P < 0.001). Repeated measures analysis revealed a statistically significant reduction in T-scores over time across all groups (P < 0.001). However, no significant interaction was observed between group classification and time (P = 0.817).

The present study demonstrates that BMD changes at non-metastatic sites in patients with bone metastases are similar to those in patients without metastases. Monitoring BMD at non-metastatic sites may provide valuable insights into ADT's effects on bone health in prostate cancer patients.

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10147-025-02711-7.

## Linked entities

- **Diseases:** prostate cancer (MONDO:0005159)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** bone (MESH:D001847), Prostate cancer (MESH:D011471), bone metastases (MESH:D009362)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11946959/full.md

## Figures

4 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11946959/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11946959