# Tolerance to a Diet of Toxic Microcystis aeruginosa in Caenorhabditis elegans

## TL;DR

This study shows that the worm C. elegans can survive and develop on a diet of toxic cyanobacteria, suggesting it could help clean up harmful algal blooms.

## Contribution

The study demonstrates C. elegans' tolerance to toxic Microcystis aeruginosa, proposing its use for bioremediation of cyanobacterial blooms.

## Key findings

- C. elegans can ingest, digest, and survive on a diet of toxic M. aeruginosa.
- A diet of M. aeruginosa had minimal impact on C. elegans health, lifespan, and behavior.
- C. elegans may be a viable candidate for bioremediating cyanobacterial blooms.

## Abstract

Reported incidences of cyanobacterial harmful algal blooms (CHABs) are increasing across the world due to climate change and nutrient loading, dominating freshwater ecosystems and producing dangerous cyanotoxins that cause ecological damage. Microcystis aeruginosa is one of the most common species of cyanobacteria; it produces hepatotoxic and neurotoxic microcystin-LR. The ecological and human impact of algal blooms is immense, and traditional CHAB remediation methods are not always adequate in eutrophic regions such as Lake Erie in North America. As a result, a proactive, targeted approach is needed to bioremediate cyanobacteria in their pre-colonial stages. Nematodes, such as the model organism Caenorhabditis elegans, are potential candidates for bioremediating cyanobacteria such as M. aeruginosa. C. elegans have metabolic pathways that could detoxify microcystin-LR and enable tolerance to cyanobacteria in nature. We analyzed C. elegans health and fat accumulation on a diet of toxic M. aeruginosa and found that C. elegans can ingest, digest, metabolize, and survive off of this diet. The mean lifespans of the worm populations were only slightly different at 20.68 ± 0.35 (mean ± S.E.M) and 17.89 ± 0.40 when fed E. coli and toxic M. aeruginosa, respectively. In addition, a diet of toxic M. aeruginosa compared to E. coli did not have any significant impact on C. elegans pharyngeal pumping (304.2 ± 9.3 versus 330.0 ± 10.4 pumps/min), dauer response (86.3 ± 1.0 versus 83.65 ± 1.0% in dauer), mobility (209.25 ± 7.0 versus 210.15 ± 4.4 thrashes/min), or SKN-1 expression based on SKN1::GFP fluorescence measurements. Overall, a diet of toxic M. aeruginosa was able to sustain C. elegans development, and C. elegans was tolerant of it. These results suggest that C. elegans and similar nematodes could be viable candidates for cyanobacterial bioremediation.