This paper is marked retracted in the scholarly record (OpenAlex). Interpret its findings with caution.
RETRACTED: Dahal et al. PERK Is Critical for Alphavirus Nonstructural Protein Translation. Viruses 2021, 13, 892
Bibha Dahal, Caitlin W. Lehman, Ivan Akhrymuk, Nicole R. Bracci, Lauren Panny, Michael D. Barrera, Nishank Bhalla, Jonathan L. Jacobs, Jonathan D. Dinman, Kylene Kehn-Hall
Abstract
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMosquito-borne diseases and control · Viral Infections and Vectors · Viral Infections and Outbreaks Research
The journal Viruses retracts the article “PERK Is Critical for Alphavirus Nonstructural Protein Translation” [1] cited above.
Following publication, the authors contacted the Editorial Office regarding reproducibility issues relating to reagent contamination [1].
Adhering to our standard procedure, the Editorial Board reviewed the supplementary information provided, including raw material relating to the authors’ attempts to replicate the results, and agreed with the authors that the central findings of this study could not be sustained and can no longer be considered valid. As a result, the Editorial Board and the authors have decided to retract this paper as per MDPI’s retraction policy (https://www.mdpi.com/ethics#_bookmark30).
This retraction was approved by the Editor-in-Chief of the journal Viruses.
The authors agreed to this retraction.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.