# An Evaluation of the NANDA International, Inc., Diagnostic Classification Among Spanish Nurses: A Cross-Sectional Study

**Authors:** Claudio-Alberto Rodríguez-Suárez, María-Isabel Mariscal-Crespo, María-Naira Hernández-De Luis, Emília-Isabel Martins Teixeira-da-Costa, Héctor González-de la Torre, Rafaela Camacho-Bejarano

PMC · DOI: 10.3390/nursrep15030079 · 2025-02-26

## TL;DR

This study evaluates how Spanish nurses use the NANDA-I nursing classification and finds that education and work environment influence their perceptions and application of it.

## Contribution

The study introduces the EVALUAN-I tool to assess NANDA-I usage and reveals how academic qualifications and roles affect its adoption among Spanish nurses.

## Key findings

- NANDA-I is the most widely used nursing language in Spain.
- Nurses with PhDs view NANDA-I as less evidence-based but more useful.
- Academic/research nurses find NANDA-I more useful and significant for diagnoses.

## Abstract

Background/Objectives: The NANDA International, Inc., (NANDA-I) diagnostic classification is the most widely used standardized nursing language internationally. The EVALUAN-I tool was developed to evaluate the NANDA-I diagnostic classification. The aim was to analyze the use of the NANDA-I diagnostic classification among Spanish nurses and assess its correlation with sociodemographic characteristics. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on a non-probabilistic sample of Spanish nurses working in clinical, management, and academic settings using the EVALUAN-I tool (September 2019–December 2020). The analysis was conducted using R® (version 3.6.3, Lavaan package; R Core Team, 2020), with statistical significance set at p < 0.05. This study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee (2019-190-1). Results: A total of 483 responses were obtained. There was a correlation between the intensity of use of NANDA-I and its application in practice (polychoric correlation = 0.50; p < 0.001). Nurses with a PhD degree considered nursing diagnoses to be less evidence-based (p = 0.037) but more useful (p = 0.035). Academic and research nurses stated that NANDA-I was more useful (p = 0.007), even for exclusive responsibilities (p = 0.034), and that it provided greater significance to diagnoses (p = 0.0012). Conclusions: NANDA-I is the most widely used standardized nursing language in Spain. Nurses’ academic qualifications and work environment significantly influence their perceptions and use of NANDA-I. Advanced education fosters a critical yet positive perspective, highlighting a relationship between the intensity of its use, its application in clinical practice, and the nurse’s educational background. Tools such as EVALUAN-I promote its integration and evidence-based practice, but challenges remain in improving perceptions, scientific evidence, and visibility in electronic health records to enhance its clinical impact and nursing recognition.

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11944877